New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Music even makes you blink to the beat

Rhythmic tunes trigger synchronized eyeblinks and automatic bopping or swaying, new research suggests

Conceptual illustration of a blue woman character, with musical notes for eyes

Thomas Fuchs

Music makes people move and groove, often in surprisingly involuntary ways. As it turns out, we even blink in time to the beat, researchers report in PLOS Biology. “Our eyes—which we usually think of as purely visual organs—spontaneously dance to the rhythm of what we hear,” says study co-author Du Yi, a cognitive neuroscientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Additional research showed certain songs cause a tendency toward either “bop” or “sway” movements.

Using a high-speed eye-tracking system, Du and her team were “stunned” to discover nonmusicians instinctively blinking in sync with the beat structure of Bach chorales (though not on every single beat, she notes, which would be “quite exhausting”). Du suspects the effect would persist for any music with a “strong groove,” not just Bach.

Synchronized blinking faded when the researchers sped up the Bach chorales to 120 beats per minute. It also disappeared when the study’s participants were asked to detect a red dot on a screen, implying that active listening is required. “It isn’t that the music ‘loses its magic’ when we’re distracted but rather that the brain reallocates its rhythmic resources to whatever we are focusing on most,” Du says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Blinking to the beat came as no surprise to Elizabeth Margulis, director of Princeton University’s Music Cognition Lab and author of an upcoming book on “musical daydreams.” After all, she notes, music activates the motor areas of the brain. Even if we’re just sitting still—and not bopping our heads, tapping our feet or dancing—“there can often be this sense of motion,” Margulis says. People tend to synchronize their steps to the beat at the gym and drive faster when listening to pulsing, absorbing songs, she notes. Those with Parkinson’s disease, meanwhile, are known to walk more steadily when music is playing.

Even voluntary music response seems to have an instinctual aspect. Shimpei Ikegami, a music psychologist at Showa Women’s University in Tokyo, asked four Japanese pop musicians to compose short musical excerpts, some designed to elicit vertical up-and-down bopping movements known as tate-nori and others designed to elicit horizontal side-to-side swaying movements called yoko-nori. Sure enough, when undergraduate nonmusicians listened to songs with a strong beat and abrupt changes in sound, they spontaneously felt like bopping. And songs characterized by a smooth timbre and mild sound changes made them want to sway.

To Ikegami, who presented his findings at a recent conference, this suggests that the music instructs us on how to move—and that runners and Parkinson’s patients, for example, might get better results with vertical music, whereas horizontal music lends itself to stretching and yoga. In general, he says, our playlists could be “much more targeted” to take advantage of powerful innate reactions to pumping up the volume.

Jesse Greenspan is a San Francisco Bay Area–based freelance journalist who writes about history and the environment.

More by Jesse Greenspan
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Lost in the Music” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042026-5M8rOO55EplGkEveQ0rCUj

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe