New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA delays Artemis II moon mission after critical test raises issues

NASA will review data gathered during a simulated launch of the Artemis II rocket before revealing a new date for its upcoming moon mission

The moon is seen shining next to the SLS (Space Launch System) and Orion spacecraft atop the mobile launcher on January 28, 2026, at Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

NASA/Sam Lott

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NASA has delayed its upcoming moon mission to at least March following a crucial test of the Artemis II rocket.

Technically a test flight, Artemis II will see four astronauts fly a 10-day journey around the moon and back to Earth, a mission that will take them farther into space than any human has gone before.

NASA on Tuesday said the mission’s wet dress rehearsal, which involved fueling the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, and then initiating a countdown sequence, had revealed issues with both the rocket and the Orion capsule that is supposed to house the four astronauts who will be flying on board.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Indeed, this critical test of Artemis II’s systems was not smooth sailing: some hours into fueling the rocket, the SLS appeared to be leaking liquid hydrogen from its core stage, which houses its main engines. That caused NASA to temporarily pause loading the rocket’s propellant in order to troubleshoot the problem. And later a valve on the Orion capsule malfunctioned as engineers also attempted to troubleshoot several dropouts of ground teams’ audio communications channels.

Fuel leaks have plagued the SLS before. Artemis I, the predecessor mission to Artemis II, also suffered from fuel leaks during its wet dress rehearsal and at other points in the lead-up to the mission, causing its launch to be delayed by weeks.

“We really did learn a lot from the Artemis I mission, and we implemented a lot of the lessons learned yesterday,” said Lori Glaze, acting associate administrator for NASA’s Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate, at a press conference on Tuesday. “We also identified some additional issues [with Artemis II], and we will be tackling those.”

In social media posts on X, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman acknowledged that the SLS “has the lowest flight rate ... of any NASA-designed vehicle and that, “with more than three years between” the last Artemis launch and Artemis II, the agency had “fully anticipated encountering challenges.”

At Tuesday’s press conference, John Honeycutt, chair of the Artemis II Mission Management Team, said teams had extensively tested the hydrogen propellant fuel lines for the SLS following the problems seen with Artemis I but that the issues that arose during Monday’s test fueling had “caught us off guard.”

Glaze added that NASA does not have a new date for a second wet dress rehearsal yet.

Editor’s Note (2/3/26): This article was updated after posting to include additional information.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe