New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

NASA spots comet reversing its spin in a first for science

In 2017 NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope zoomed in on a comet as it passed around the sun. And then things took a more unusual turn

An illustration of a comet with a jet of gas coming from it in space

NASA, ESA, CSA, Ralf Crawford (STScI)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers caught a comet in the act of reversing its spin. Using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, scientists noticed the never-before-seen behavior of Comet 41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresák (41P to its friends) after it passed around the sun in 2017.

In May of that year, data from NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory suggested the object was spinning some three times slower than it had just two months before, in March 2017. A follow-up Hubble analysis revealed something even more unusual: after the comet slowed down, it started spinning much faster again. The comet likely slowed to the point of almost stopping entirely before volatile activity at its surface forced it to spin in the opposite direction, the researchers suggest of the odd behavior.

This activity likely took the form of outgassing jets—as the comet approached the sun, the star’s heat would have caused frozen ices to become gas.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Jets of gas streaming off the surface can act like small thrusters,” said David Jewitt of the University of California, Los Angeles, a co-author of a paper describing the observations that was published on Thursday in the Astronomical Journal, in a statement. “If those jets are unevenly distributed, they can dramatically change how a comet, especially a small one, rotates.”

Essentially, the jets could have slowed the comet, eventually flipping its direction of rotation.

“It’s like pushing a merry-go-round,” Jewitt said. “If it’s turning in one direction, and then you push against that, you can slow it and reverse it.”

The observations represent a rare opportunity to see the evolution of a comet on a short timescale—generally, changes to a comet on this scale take centuries or more to come about. Comet 41P is believed to have originated in the Kuiper Belt, out at the far reaches of the solar system, before it was flung inward at some point by Jupiter’s gravitational pull. Scientists think it has occupied its current orbit for about 1,500 years, but it appears to be losing mass at a rapid pace, something Jewitt suggests will lead to the comet’s self-destruction.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe