Neanderthal genes may give modern humans’ muscles a boost

Most of the world’s population carries at least a little Neanderthal DNA

A skull on a black background.

The rebuilt skull of a 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman named Shanidar Z, after the cave in Iraqi Kurdistan where her skull was found in 2018.

JUSTIN TALLIS/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s no secret that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred: most of the world’s population today has around 1 or 2 percent of Neanderthal DNA. We know a little about how that genetic ancestry influences our bodies today—its effects on the immune system, for example—but there’s still much we don’t know.

Now a new study suggests that, for some of us, our muscles may get a boost from Neanderthal genetics.

Researchers looked at differences between the modern human and Neanderthal genomes and identified distinct genetic changes in Neanderthals’ growth hormone receptor—a key cell protein that helps regulate growth throughout the body. In lab experiments, cells with the Neanderthal receptor grew more than cells with the modern human version. The results could help explain Neanderthals’ “robust build,” the authors write.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People who carry at least one Neanderthal version of the receptor tend to have more muscle than those who don’t—271 additional grams, the authors report. People who inherited the trait from both parents often have even more muscle mass. According to the study, the variant is most common in populations in South and East Asia, with as many as 24 percent carrying a Neanderthal version of the receptor.

“It is rare to see laboratory and population evidence fit together so clearly,” said Philipp Kanis, first author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, in a statement. “Cells grown in the laboratory responded more strongly, while data from more than a million people showed signs of the same effect in the body.”

If you aren’t among those blessed with this genetic gift, there’s still the gym.

“As someone who does CrossFit, I was delighted to find Neandertal genetics and muscle mass coming together in the same study,” said Miriam Berreiter, a co-author of the study and a Ph.D. student at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, in the same statement. “But even a Neandertal growth hormone receptor is no substitute for training.”

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe