New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Neanderthal genes may give modern humans’ muscles a boost

Most of the world’s population carries at least a little Neanderthal DNA

A skull on a black background.

The rebuilt skull of a 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman named Shanidar Z, after the cave in Iraqi Kurdistan where her skull was found in 2018.

JUSTIN TALLIS/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s no secret that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred: most of the world’s population today has around 1 or 2 percent of Neanderthal DNA. We know a little about how that genetic ancestry influences our bodies today—its effects on the immune system, for example—but there’s still much we don’t know.

Now a new study suggests that, for some of us, our muscles may get a boost from Neanderthal genetics.

Researchers looked at differences between the modern human and Neanderthal genomes and identified distinct genetic changes in Neanderthals’ growth hormone receptor—a key cell protein that helps regulate growth throughout the body. In lab experiments, cells with the Neanderthal receptor grew more than cells with the modern human version. The results could help explain Neanderthals’ “robust build,” the authors write.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People who carry at least one Neanderthal version of the receptor tend to have more muscle than those who don’t—271 additional grams, the authors report. People who inherited the trait from both parents often have even more muscle mass. According to the study, the variant is most common in populations in South and East Asia, with as many as 24 percent of people in some parts of South Asia carrying a Neanderthal version of the receptor.

“It is rare to see laboratory and population evidence fit together so clearly,” said Philipp Kanis, first author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, in a statement. “Cells grown in the laboratory responded more strongly, while data from more than a million people showed signs of the same effect in the body.”

If you aren’t among those blessed with this genetic gift, there’s still the gym.

“As someone who does CrossFit, I was delighted to find Neandertal genetics and muscle mass coming together in the same study,” said Miriam Berreiter, a co-author of the study and a Ph.D. student at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, in the same statement. “But even a Neandertal growth hormone receptor is no substitute for training.”

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe