New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Orchids Need Bees More Than Bees Need Them

Orchid pollinators are surprisingly promiscuous about the plants they like

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Biologists have long believed that orchid bees and orchids rely on each other in equal measure. The shimmering bees pollinate orchids in return for the flowers’ donation of perfumes, which male bees use to attract females. And so it was thought that the two organisms co-evolved. But a study led by Santiago Ramírez, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, that was published in Science in late 2011 revealed that the bees arose first, thus suggesting that the two are more independent than previously thought.

Ramírez’s work shows that although the orchids seem very adapted to the bees—having developed scents that bees like and mechanisms to deposit pollen onto the bees’ body—the insects are far less specialized. They collect scents from more than 700 species of plants, and they pollinate an array of them. “The bees and plants all interact,” Ramírez says, “and we know very little about how those networks of interactions evolve.”

Learning more about the bees could help scientists understand their role in pollinating tropical orchids, many of which are in danger of extinction. The bees are in danger themselves, threatened by deforestation and land fragmentation in their native Central and South America, which has been wiping out the bees’ habitat and food sources. As a result, André Nemésio, a researcher at the Federal University of Uberlândia in Brazil who studies the elusive creatures, worries that scientists will not learn about the bees quickly enough to save them. “Orchid bees are solitary, very shy, and you almost never see them in the forest,” he says. Moreover, because no one knows exactly how important the bees are to the plants they pollinate or to their predators, the consequences of losing them present yet another mystery. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This article was published in print as "Busy Bee."

Rose Eveleth is a writer and producer who explores how humans tangle with science and technology. She's the creator and host Flash Forward, a podcast about possible (and not so possible) futures, and has covered everything from fake tumbleweed farms to million dollar baccarat heists.

More by Rose Eveleth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Busy Bee” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 5 (), p. 62
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0612-62

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe