New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Patent Watch: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor Device

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Molecularly imprinted polymer sensor device: Ketamine, Rohypnol and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) are so-called date-rape drugs that render victims compliant and vulnerable to sexual assault. To easily detect such drugs in a drink, George Murray, now chief scientist for Raptor Detection Technologies, and his colleagues turned to polymer chemistry.

Patent no. 8,241,575 details a thin, hollow device lined with polymer molecules cradling dye-tagged versions of the drugs. When the tube is placed in a spiked drink, capillary action draws liquid up, and the dye-tagged molecules swap places with those in the drink. In a positive sample, the drink inside the straw will quickly change color and creep up the length of the tube, alerting the would-be drinker. Murray's method builds each unit of the polymer piece by piece, giving him precise control over the number of chemical binding sites inside the device. Solutions with more drug molecules will displace dye farther up the tube, and how high the color change appears corresponds to concentration.

The method can also be used to detect other chemicals—the designer simply embeds the desired target molecule in the plastic matrix. Murray's employer already markets molecularly imprinted polymers as explosive detectors and holds the license to the date-rape prevention device.

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Patent Watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 1 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0113-18b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe