New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Science behind Record-Breaking Everest Blizzard That Trapped Hundreds

A blizzard that trapped hundreds of trekkers on Mount Everest was truly “off the charts,” experts explain

View of Mt. Everest from Tibet with a group of hikers in the foreground

Hundreds of trekkers were recently trapped on Mount Everest, which is shown here in a stock photo.

DavorLovincic/Getty Images

A blizzard that trapped hundreds of trekkers on the north side of Mount Everest last weekend captured headlines for its proximity to the famed peak. But less appreciated was the truly bizarre nature of the blizzard: the amount of snow that fell within 12 hours was 3.5 times greater than anything measured at the mountain before.

“It’s off the charts in terms of the six-year record we have from the weather stations on Everest,” says Tom Matthews, a climate scientist at King’s College London, who co-led the expedition to the highest weather station on earth at Everest in 2019. He uses a comparison to human heights to drive home the oddity: “Over the last six years,” he says, “the tallest person you might have seen was someone six feet, seven inches come to base camp; on [October] 4 a giant 23 feet tall rolled up.”

About 900 trekkers and guides were rescued in the days after the storm, according to the Associated Press. These individuals were trekking to and around the base camp on the mountain’s north side in Tibet during China’s National Day and Mid-Autumn Festival holiday break. In Nepal the precipitation fell as rain, causing widespread flooding and landslides that killed at least 47, according to Al Jazeera.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The heavy blizzard dropped around three feet of snow in the Gama Valley of Tibet last Friday and Saturday, according to reporting. This came during a period that is typically dry and mild in the region. The rainy monsoon season in Tibet and Nepal runs from May to mid-September. Most climbers try to summit Everest in the spring, before the monsoon begins. The few climbers who do attempt the peak in October are lured by smaller crowds and typically clear skies.

But it wasn’t climbers who were most affected by the storm. The people who were trapped by the snow that fell on October 3 and 4 were tourists trying to peer up at the mountain from its base in Tibet’s Tingri County. A popular four- to five-day trek takes adventurous tourists from the village of Old Tingri to Everest’s northern base camp, called North Base Camp, which sits around 17,000 feet above sea level. People can also now drive to North Base Camp, says Kent Moore, a professor of atmospheric physics at the University of Toronto Mississauga, who studies mountain meteorology. Last weekend the route may have been more crowded than usual because of the holiday.

“It’s easy to put yourself in a situation that’s quite dangerous now,” Moore says. Twenty years ago the event would have been a “nothingburger,” he adds, because nobody would have been in the area. But infrastructure improvements in Tibet have drawn more and more people to Everest’s remote north side. And because it’s easy to get to North Base Camp quickly, such tourists may not be as acclimated to high elevation as trekkers to the mountain’s South Base Camp in Nepal, which requires about a two-week hike to reach from Kathmandu.

“A snowstorm at sea level is not a big deal,” Moore says. “But when you’re at 5,000 meters [16,440 feet], everything is just harder to do.”

According to Nepal’s Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM), a low-pressure system in the Bay of Bengal intensified the monsoon that triggered the precipitation. Trekkers also reported wind and near-continuous lightning on Everest’s north side. Meteorologists are still analyzing the weather pattern, Matthews says. But two low-pressure systems, one on either side of India, may have contributed to the event by funneling high levels of water vapor from the Bay of Bengal into the Everest region. Possibly exacerbating the issue, Moore says, was the fact that the surface of the Bay of Bengal is currently two degrees Celsius warmer than its historical monthly average. Warmer water evaporates more readily, providing more vapor that could then condense into snow.

Heavier precipitation events are expected to increase as the climate warms, Moore says. “That’s just because, when the air is warmer, it can hold more water vapor,” he adds. “Water vapor is what leads to storms and what leads to precipitation.”

As of October 6, the monsoon was withdrawing from the region, according to Nepal’s DHM.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe