New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Redwoods Grow Weird Leaves to Suck Water from Air

Here’s how they choose the right leaf for the job

Alana Chin/University of California, Davis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Coastal California's redwood forests—with their lush ferns, towering trees and damp petrichor scent—might not seem to want for water, but they do face dry summers. To survive them, the trees, Sequoia sempervirens, grow specialized shoots with leaves that scrape moisture from the air.

Many plants (including redwoods) are known to drink through their leaves, but “no one ever really figured out how the water gets in there,” says ecologist Alana Chin, now at ETH Zürich. Exposing leaves to moisture has costs: even a thin film of water can block the flow of carbon dioxide into leaf openings called stomata, hindering photosynthesis.

To see how the trees solve this dilemma, Chin and her colleagues climbed redwoods in various climate zones and snipped twig samples. Back in the laboratory, they generated fog with a humidifier and measured how much water these leafy shoots absorbed. They also examined leaf surfaces and cross sections, then modeled water movement to see which traits affect uptake.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Their analysis, published in the American Journal of Botany, revealed two distinct redwood shoot types. Resembling asparagus stalks with leaves bunched close to the twig, “axial” shoots make up a small portion of the canopy but absorb water at about four times the rate of ordinary-looking “peripheral” shoots. The team estimated a tall redwood absorbs up to 13 gallons of water in the hour after it gets wet. Meanwhile peripheral leaves power photosynthesis with dense stomata and waxy, water-repellent coatings.

The study found that redwoods in drier, southern areas have more axial shoots that are located higher up than on northern trees, which helps the former pull extra water from summer fog and light rain. Other tree species may have similarly specialized shoots; pines, for example, have two types that might be analogous to those on redwoods, Chin says. Such versatility could be important in the context of climate change, notes Wake Forest University ecologist Carter Berry, who was not involved in the study. “In a drier world,” he says, “the ability to subsidize your water source with water from the air becomes more important.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe