New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Restoring Flow--Working Knowledge on Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left ventricular assist devices

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although artificial hearts are stymied by complications, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are extending lives. Doctors began implanting them two decades ago to keep heart failure patients alive while they waited for weeks or months for an available transplant organ. Today improved designs are being installed as final fixes. Indeed, the distinction between an LVAD used as a bridge to transplant and as a permanent aid "is disappearing," says Kiyotaka Fukamachi, head of the Cleveland Clinic's Cardiovascular Dynamics Laboratory. "Some patients who received an LVAD as a bridge have been living with it for two or three years."

A healthy left ventricle pumps freshly oxygenated blood through the aorta to the body. LVADs help the ventricle or take over its operations if the chamber is weak or has stopped functioning. First-generation designs, which still prevail, are pulsatile: an implanted pump pushes blood in pulses like a natural heart. Second-generation LVADs are smaller, relying on a rotor that continuously streams blood. Engineers are evaluating experimental, third-generation devices that use magnetically levitated rotors, reducing moving parts.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Restoring Flow” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032007-ORNHblncrnqOuFMGrQeMt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe