New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Rising Temperatures Lead to A Spike in Sugar Consumption

Warmer temperatures are associated with higher consumption of sugary beverages and frozen treats, raising concerns about long-term health effects

A child holds and sips from a glass full of fizzy cola in a sunny room

Catherine Falls Commercial/Getty Images

When the heat sets in, the siren song of the ice cream truck begins to drift through the air, and lemonade stands run by enterprising neighborhood children pop up along sidewalks. These sweet treats are often synonymous with summer, and a new study has found that sugar consumption in the U.S. rises noticeably as temperatures climb. The increase is particularly apparent among certain groups of people and raises concerns over the health implications as the climate continues to heat up.

Much of the research on global warming and food to date has looked at how changes in the climate affect, for example, crop yields or the nutritional content of food or at how food production and consumption contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Pan He, an environmental scientist at Cardiff University in Wales, hit on the idea to look at the inverse relationship: how rising temperatures affect food consumption. She and her colleagues decided to focus on sugar because its overconsumption is a known problem in the U.S. and is linked to diabetes, heart disease and certain kinds of cancer.

The researchers paired temperature data with a unique dataset that showed household grocery purchases around the U.S. from 2004 to 2019 and used purchases as a proxy for consumption. They found little difference in consumption below 12 degrees Celsius (about 54 degrees Fahrenheit). But between that temperature and 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), something happened: consumption increased by 0.7 gram per degree C. There was a slowdown above 30 degrees C, which the study authors posit could be related to extreme heat often suppressing appetite.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most of the overall increase came from beverages with added sugar, such as sodas or fruit drinks, as opposed to 100 percent juice. Frozen desserts such as ice cream or popsicles made a smaller contribution. There was a slight decrease in the consumption of sugary foods such as cakes or cookies, which suggests people may be substituting chilled treats for other options.

Bar chart shows change in added sugar consumption for each two-degree increment, from 0 to more than 34 degrees Celsius. Three more charts show the equivalent values for specific product types: beverages; frozen desserts; and baked goods, oils and sugar products.

The increase is concerning because the average recommended daily sugar intake for a 2,400-calorie diet is about 60 grams—and a single can of soda can have around 40. (The American Heart Association recommends even lower limits of sugar intake each day: 24 grams for women and 36 grams for men.)

There were noticeable differences in consumption patterns, though. People with higher levels of income or educational attainment showed very little change in sugar consumption as temperatures rose compared with those with lower incomes or less formal education. “The difference can be up to more than five times,” says study co-author Duo Chan, a climate scientist at the University of Southampton in England. “So this is a drastic difference, and I believe this should raise some concerns and awareness among society.”

Bar charts shows change in added sugar consumption for specific temperature increments across different household income levels and education levels of male and female heads of household.

The difference could be linked to a number of factors: Those with higher incomes often have more reliable access to safely drinkable tap water. They tend to work in indoor environments, where air-conditioning may mean there is less need to stay hydrated. And they may be more aware of the potential health consequences of high sugar consumption.

The researchers projected that, without any interventions, sugar consumption in the U.S. will continue to rise as human-caused warming continues.

Besides addressing the root causes of climate change, ways to tackle this problem could include increasing nutritional education, requiring sugar content to be more prominently labeled on packaging or instituting an added sugar tax. Such a tax already exists in the U.K., and “you see a very, very significant difference” in the price of regular versus diet soda, Chan says. Other strategies could also tackle two problems at once: for example, requiring accessible drinking water and breaks at outdoor workplaces such as farms or construction sites could lower the consumption of sugary beverages—as well as the general risk of heat-related illness.

Alice Lichtenstein, a nutrition scientist at Tufts University, who wasn’t involved with the new study, says she would like to see more research into how the accessibility and pricing of such beverages compare with those of water for disadvantaged groups in attempt to come up with possible interventions. “We need to understand more about what the behavioral triggers are for making negative health-related decisions, such as increased sugar-sweetened beverage intake in hot weather,” she says, “and use that information to design strategies to mitigate the behaviors.”

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe