New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Search for alien technology on interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS comes up empty

Even though astronomers didn’t detect alien tech signals from a rare interstellar visitor, the results are worthwhile, they say

A radio telescope with a starry background.

The Allen Telescope Array at the Hat Creek Radio Observatory.

Seth Shostak/SETI Institute

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When Comet 3I/ATLAS entered our solar system last year—only the third known interstellar object to do so—astronomers took notice. And so did scientists involved in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). These researchers were curious whether this particular interloper may have been linked to aliens.

When astronomers first discovered 3I/ATLAS in July 2025, the icy body was traveling at an impressive speed of about 137,000 miles per hour. Researchers later discovered that it was “bursting with methanol” and that its coma—the vapor envelope that formed as the icy object neared the sun—was full of frozen carbon dioxide. Both observations provided astronomers with clues about the comet’s cosmic origin. All signs suggested the interstellar object was natural, but some astronomers took the opportunity to look for so-called technosignatures, particularly radio signals that could be produced by something artificial.

“Eventually, our own Voyager spacecraft will be extraterrestrial artifacts in other stellar systems,” said Sofia Sheikh, a research scientist at the SETI Institute, in a statement, referring to the twin interstellar probes that NASA launched in 1977. “Given that, it is important that we understand the natural distribution of interstellar objects so that we will be able to identify any anomalies that could one day be signs of an artificial interstellar object.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To help rule out the possibility that 3I/ATLAS contained some kind of alien technology, Sheikh and her colleagues tracked the comet with a radio telescope, the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), and looked for narrowband radio signals—“the kind that can only come from technology,” Sheikh says. “After analyzing several hours of data across the full frequency range of the ATA,” Sheikh and the team did not see any signals, or technosignatures, associated with 3I/ATLAS, she says.

Sheikh wasn’t surprised by the results. “All of the evidence that the global scientific community had found before, during and after our observations indicated that 3I/ATLAS was an icy rock from another solar system—extremely cool from a planetary science perspective but not in any way a technological artifact,” she says.

That doesn’t mean the study wasn’t valuable. For one, null results—in this case, findings that are not unusual or revelatory—are still useful. And Sheikh notes the investigation was good practice for the next interstellar object.

“By better understanding natural objects like 3I/ATLAS and practicing our methodologies on real-world events, we are better prepared to observe and analyze other interstellar objects, including potentially artificial objects, in the future,” she says.

The new study was published on Wednesday in the Astronomical Journal.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe