New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Secret to a Longer (Worm's) Life: A Breath of Poison Gas

Small quantities of toxic hydrogen sulfide in the air lengthen life in a nematode by 70 percent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Consider the life of a nematode: Caenorhabditis elegans, a diminutive, soil-dwelling, hermaphroditic worm that has had its entire genetic code (all base pairs) mapped. Coupled with its reproductive potential, this creature makes a perfect lab specimen. Each worm can expect to live for only a few weeks—unless it is lucky enough to reside in an atmosphere laced with small quantities of hydrogen sulfide. At concentrations of just 50 parts per million, the toxic gas can extend worm longevity by as much as 10 days.

"They were able to withstand higher temperatures than animals that did not have hydrogen sulfide and they were more long lived," says biologist Mark Roth of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, who teamed with Hutchinson biologist Dana Miller on the study. "They lived 70 percent longer, which is considerably longer. If you add 70 percent to your own life that's a lot."

There is currently no reason to believe that hydrogen sulfide, which is deadly at high concentrations, will have the same effect on humans, although Roth and others have shown that it can put mice into a state of suspended animation. Roth and his colleagues are currently assessing the safety of low concentrations of the gas in humans in order to assess its potential to place removed organs into a state of suspended animation for longer, better storage prior to transplant or even to put critically injured patients into the state to enable more time for lifesaving interventions. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That potential remains unproved and, in this case at least, H2S has rendered surprising results. Contrary to Roth's expectations, the worms thrived instead of entering a suspended state  when exposed to the gas. And when subjected to high temperatures (95 degrees Fahrenheit, or 35 degrees Celsius), those in the more sulfurous atmospheres lived eight times longer than their peers.

The biologists are not sure exactly why this occurs but they did discover that the benefits of  H2S were lost when they removed the gene known as sir-2.1linked to long life. "It's a demonstration of the requirement or need for that gene product to have sulfide work its magic," Roth says.

The ultimate goal, he says, is to understand the role H2S plays in maximizing survival, whether in worms, mice or, potentially, people. But the long history of the healing effect of natural sulfur springs—volcanic fissures that emit sulfurous water and gases, such as  H2S—attests to the fact that the tiny nematode is certainly not the first hint that hydrogen sulfide might have beneficial properties.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe