New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See Your Body’s Cells in Size and Number

The larger a cell type is, the rarer it is in the body—and vice versa—a new study shows

A series of Voronoi diagrams shows mass of body systems and breakdown by cell class.

Ni-ka Ford and Jen Christiansen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many aspects of our world, from the body mass of creatures in the animal kingdom to the population of cities across the globe, follow an intriguing mathematical pattern. Known as Zipf's law, the rule says that when something's size is doubled, that thing becomes about half as common. Researchers wondered whether the law extended to the human body. Ecologist Ian A. Hatton of McGill University, independent researcher Jeffery A. Shander and their colleagues amassed data about the volume and frequency of human cells and looked for the pattern. It turns out that it holds.

“As you double the volume of a cell, the frequency of cells of that size is halved,” Hatton says. Teensy, nonnucleated red blood cells are by far the most common cells in our bodies, whereas the comparatively gigantic muscle cells in our arms and legs are the scarcest. Being able to use a cell's size to estimate its frequency in the body could help doctors better understand certain body systems and hard-to-count cell types, the researchers say. The study suggests, for instance, that immune cells called lymphocytes are far more common than biologists realized.

Credit: Ni-ka Ford (illustrations) and Jen Christiansen (chart); “The Human Cell Count and Size Distribution,” by Ian A. Hatton et al., in PNAS, Vol. 120; September 2023 (data)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


NUMBER AND AGGREGATE MASS OF CELLS IN THE HUMAN BODY, BY CELL CLASS

(Calculated for a 60-kilogram female form.) These two strands show the hierarchy of cells by number (frequency in the body) as well as by how much total biomass they account for in the body. The discrepancy between the two arises from the fact that the most numerous cells are often very small and therefore contribute only a modest amount of biomass, whereas the more massive cells, though relatively uncommon, make up much of our heft. Total cell mass does not equal total body mass, because bodies also include large volumes of water.

Credit: Jen Christiansen; “The Human Cell Count and Size Distribution,” by Ian A. Hatton et al., in PNAS, Vol. 120; September 2023 (data)

MASS OF BODY SYSTEMS

(Calculated for a 60-kilogram female form.) Different systems in the human body account for differing amounts of our total biomass. The largest system, the integumentary and adipose tissues, consists mainly of skin and fat.

Credit: Ni-ka Ford (illustrations) and Jen Christiansen (chart); “The Human Cell Count and Size Distribution,” by Ian A. Hatton et al., in PNAS, Vol. 120; September 2023 (data)

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Ni-ka Ford is a Certified Medical Illustrator who creates didactic illustrations and 3D visualizations for scientific research, journal publications, medical education, and patient educational materials. Her work can be found at www.enlightvisuals.com

More by Ni-ka Ford
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Cells by Count and Size” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 1 (), p. 94
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0124-94

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe