Stolen Bacterial Genes Helped Whiteflies to Become the Ultimate Pests

Rather than relying on bacteria, whiteflies cut out the middleman and acquired their own genes to process nitrogen

Two whiteflies against a green background

Whiteflies.

Nigel Cattlin/Alamy Stock Photo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tiny, sap-eating whiteflies wreak agricultural havoc by spreading multiple plant viruses and secreting sticky, mold-attracting goo on the 500-odd plant species they eat. Now a study in Science Advances reveals one secret to their outsize clout. Scientists led by Youjun Zhang of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences found that these persistent pests have acquired bacterial genes that let them process nitrogen with incredible efficiency.

“Nitrogen makes the world go round,” as Harvard University evolutionary biologist Naomi Pierce puts it. Animals use nitrogen-containing amino acids to make proteins and DNA, but those processes create toxic by-products. Some insects have evolved relationships with symbiotic bacteria that recycle usable nitrogen from this waste.

The new study suggests whiteflies were able to leave this partnership millions of years ago by incorporating two nitrogen- recycling genes from such bacteria into their own DNA. Ted Turlings, a chemical ecologist at Switzerland’s University of Neuchâtel and one of the study’s senior authors, says viruses—which are known experts in transferring DNA—most likely took those genes from bacteria and happened to deposit them in a nearby insect genome. This process is called horizontal gene transfer.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The “in-house” genes now help whiteflies convert more amino acids into waste when they have too much nitrogen in their bodies, then recycle that waste back into amino acids when they don’t have enough. Plants vary a lot in amino acid content; the captured genes may be what lets these pests thrive on such a wide variety of them, the study authors say.

Cooperating with bacteria to recycle nitrogen would be more energetically expensive for the flies than cutting out the middleman and just doing it themselves. And it takes still more energy to make sure the relationship doesn’t turn parasitic, Pierce says: “If you have a symbiont living in your body, you need to have ways to control it. Otherwise, it could end up controlling you.”

The transferred genes may be a helpful survival tactic for whiteflies, but Turlings says they could also be an Achilles’ heel. Because these genes are particular to whiteflies, pest-control strategies such as modifying plants to disrupt the flies’ genes will not harm other organisms. “This is as close to perfect as you can get in terms of specificity,” he says.

Whiteflies’ acquisition history goes beyond this case; they are also known to have gained plant genes that let them neutralize the plants’ defensive toxins, says University of Amsterdam’s Petra Bleeker, who studies plant-insect interactions. “It seems that horizontal gene transfer is not uncommon in insects,” she says, “but whiteflies appear to be champions.”

Rohini Subrahmanyam is a biologist turned science journalist. She loves writing about interesting creatures on our planet. Subrahmanyam received a Ph.D. from the National Center for Biological Sciences at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in India. Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) @rohsubb and on LinkedIn, and see her portfolio here.

More by Rohini Subrahmanyam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Lucky Genes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 6 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062024-5Gyt6Zckd5d91FdZIDYaoO

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe