New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stunningly Hot Galaxy Cluster Puts New Spin on How These Cosmic Behemoths Evolved

Scientists detected gas at least five times hotter than previous theories had predicted inside a galaxy cluster from the early universe

Artist’s impression of a forming galaxy cluster in the early universe

Lingxiao Yuan

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A scorchingly hot galaxy cluster in the early universe has left scientists baffled. The cluster was already blistering hot when the universe was just 1.4 billion years old—it is at least five times hotter than past theories had suggested could exist at that moment in our cosmos. The findings were detailed in a new study published on Monday in Nature.

“We didn’t expect to see such a hot cluster atmosphere so early in cosmic history,” said Dazhi Zhou, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of British Columbia and lead author of the paper, in a statement.

Zhou and his colleagues found that the gas that is threaded between the 30 or so active galaxies in this cluster, known as SPT2349-56, is much hotter and more plentiful than it should be. The gas is far hotter than the sun, Zhou told New Scientist, and far hotter than what many astronomers find in present-day clusters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, or ALMA, Zhou and his team were able to peer back to the early universe. Their findings suggest that there were more objects like SPT2349-56 producing vast amounts of energy during a moment in the universe’s early history in which scientists had thought such objects simply didn’t do so.

The team doesn’t know why the gas is so hot, but future research to find out could help astronomers better understand how the universe as we know it evolved. “Understanding galaxy clusters is the key to understanding the biggest galaxies in the universe,” which mostly reside in clusters, said Scott Chapman, a professor at Dalhousie University and a co-author on the new study, in the same statement.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe