New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Telecom Cables Measured an Earthquake in Incredible Detail

Fiber optics that connect the world can detect its earthquakes, too

Globe with latitude lines creating a seismograph pattern

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The same optic fibers that pulse with the world’s Internet traffic are now listening to the pulse of the planet, picking up earthquake tremors in better detail than traditional seismic networks do.

In a recent Science study, researchers used 15 kilometers of telecom fiber near Mendocino, Calif., to record the region’s biggest earthquake in five years—capturing in fine detail how the magnitude 7 rupture started, slowed and sped up, accelerating even faster than the speed of sound.

“This is almost as if you look at Saturn and say, ‘That’s a star.’ Then, you are given a new telescope and suddenly realize, ‘Oh, my God, there’s actually a ring around it!’” says Zhongwen Zhan, a geophysicist at the California Institute of Technology, who was not involved in the study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Optical fiber, one of modern science’s most remarkable inventions, is built to transmit light, which can carry encoded information with extreme efficiency. Even a small touch or bend can disrupt its flow, so telecom companies work hard to minimize environmental interference. “Yet what’s noise to telecommunications is data to us,” Zhan says.

The oil industry adopted this technology in the 1990s, deploying specialized fiber-optic cables to detect temperature, pressure and vibration during drilling. James Atterholt, a seismologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, hoped to adapt such observations to an actual earthquake. In May 2022 Atterholt and his team set up a device called an interrogator—“basically a big box with a laser and a computer,” he says—to send beams of light through an unused fiber on a coastal telephone cable. Depending on ground vibrations, tiny imperfections in the fiber reflected the light back every few meters, turning the thread into 2,800 mini seismometers.

On December 5, 2024, when the quake struck Cape Mendocino, Atterholt’s team was still monitoring the fiber-optic system. Its data revealed how the rupture moved eastward, slowed near a junction where three tectonic plates meet, and then accelerated to “supershear” speed, generating a sonic boom because it was traveling faster than the speed of sound. This was one of the clearest demonstrations of the complexity of a fault leading to supershear rupture, the researchers say. Recording comparable data with the existing seismometer network would require an even more enormous earthquake essentially right on top of the instruments.

Although this technology has been around for a while, “the actual demonstration of it in a proven case shows that it can improve earthquake early-warning systems,” says Brad Lipovsky, a geophysicist at the University of Washington, who was not involved in the study. Such a system would be especially crucial for coastal cities vulnerable to offshore quakes and tsunamis. Lipovsky and Zhan both also highlight the technology’s usefulness in extreme environments, such as Antarctica, where specially installed cable could monitor changing terrain and glaciers’ response to climate change.

Saugat Bolakhe is a freelance science journalist. He studied zoology as an undergraduate in Nepal and received a master’s degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York. His work has appeared in Scientific American, Nature, New Scientist, Quanta, Eos, Discover, Knowable and other publications.

More by Saugat Bolakhe
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Cable Quakes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 1 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012026-2wyuUp6KPIdiCHrQjte9RN

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe