New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Did poop fuel paleontology’s vaunted Cambrian explosion?

The Cambrian explosion is a critical moment for life on Earth—and it may have been all about poop

A grey coprolite, or fossil poop

A coprolite

State Natural History Museum Karlsruhe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some 540 million years ago, life on Earth suddenly got interesting. For 20 million years or so, evolution went into overdrive. Called the Cambrian explosion, scientists have no idea why it happened.

“We see the first evidence of basically every major animal group all pop into existence,” says Karma Nanglu, a paleontologist at the University of California, Riverside. “We start getting things like eyes, claws, teeth and complex jaw apparatuses. We have antennae, we’ve got fins, we’ve got tails.”

What drove all that activity? Some theories posit that it was caused by a spike in ocean oxygen levels, a threshold of climate stability or an evolutionary race of sorts as animals competed with one another for resources. And now there’s a new, less glamorous hypothesis to add to the mix: poop.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s the premise of a paper published earlier this month in Trends in Ecology & Evolution. The research began as an effort to categorize known examples of fossilized poop, or coprolites, from both before and during the Cambrian explosion.

This is harder than you might think: Fossil poop is generally not what paleontologists are looking for on a dig. As a result, many coprolites are either forgotten about or consigned to archives, while others just get left behind at the dig site, says Julien Kimmig, a paleontologist at the State Natural History Museum Karlsruhe in Germany and one of the paper’s two co-authors.

As they worked, the researchers quickly realized that coprolites became larger, more structured and more common at around the same time that early animals started moving deeper into the ocean, diversifying as they went. The correlation reminded the scientists about how modern deep-sea life relies on falling poop to bring vital nutrients down from richer ecosystems above. That led them to propose that an increasing deluge of poop may have helped spur the Cambrian explosion—by sending nutrients to the deep.

This is just a theory. Nanglu, who wasn’t involved in the new research, says it will be tricky to figure out what came first, animal diversity or more abundant poop. And Sara Pruss, a paleontologist at Smith College, who was also not involved in the new research, notes that the Cambrian explosion had a beginning and an end—but poop has continued to pile up.

Nevertheless, Pruss says she is pleased to see a new aspect of ecology brought into discussions of the Cambrian. “The more that our models and our thinking incorporate all of the things that were happening, the better our understanding will be,” she says.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe