New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These bizarre fossils represent some of the earliest moving, sexually reproducing life ever discovered

New trove of fossils reveals that ancestral animals likely emerged in the deep sea

Flat, frondlike and blobby creatures explore or extend from the ocean floor in an illustration.

Disklike Dickinsonia, horseshoe Kimberella and blobby Funisia thrived on the Ediacaran seafloor.

Alex Boersma

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Today a stretch of Canada’s remote Northwest Territories is covered in snowcapped peaks. But more than half a billion years ago this wilderness was a seafloor home to the wrinkled “pancakes,” fleshy fronds and spiral-shaped critters that were among Earth’s earliest complex life-forms.

Researchers recently unearthed a trove of fossils that reset the timeline for when these curious creatures scuttled onto the evolutionary scene. The new fossils, as described in Science Advances, also suggest that the deep sea served as an environmental cradle for complex life.

Found in Canada’s Mackenzie Mountains, the fossils date back 567 million years and provide a rare window into the geological period called the Ediacaran, which ended just before the Cambrian explosion of biological diversity. To reach the site, study lead author Scott Evans, a paleontologist at the American Museum of Natural History, and his colleagues embarked on a 14-hour drive and a helicopter flight.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Imprint of an oval-shaped creature in reddish-brown rock.

One of the site’s fossils of Dickinsonia, an early complex organism that absorbed bacteria and algae as it moved along the seafloor.

Scott Evans/American Museum of Natural History

The fossils, many preserved as detailed imprints on slabs of mud-colored rock, were worth the journey. In total, the team collected more than 100 remnants of strange, soft-bodied creatures that are the first known to reach major milestones in the evolution of life as we know it. Compared with finds from earlier in the Ediacaran, these organisms “look a little more like animals that we’re familiar with,” Evans says. “They move around, and some of them are reproducing sexually.”

Among these early movers were the Frisbee-like Dickinsonia, which lacked a mouth and hoovered up algae through its underbelly, and Kimberella, a teardrop-shaped creature that scraped the seafloor and may be related to modern mollusks. The site also yielded fossils of spongelike, tubular organisms known as Funisia, which were among the first complex creatures to reproduce sexually. Scientists think they sent sperm and eggs into the water column like today’s corals do.

Horseshoe-shaped imprint in the rock.

A Kimberella fossil.

Scott Evans/American Museum of Natural History

The fossils are among the earliest found for creatures of this complexity. This discovery “extends early animals deeper in time,” says Mary Droser, a paleontologist at the University of California, Riverside, who was not involved with the paper but discussed the fossils with the study authors. She notes that the animals of the Ediacaran have long been divided into distinct groupings, beginning with simple stationary species that were replaced by more complex creatures emerging around 559 million years ago. Instead the new fossils reveal that these groups lived side by side for millions of years.

The fossils’ location also provides crucial environmental context for the rise of ancestral animals. Based on the site’s rocks, which did not preserve ripples or other signs of waves, the team posits that this area was once part of the ocean floor.

Multiple raised fossils of a blobby, segmented creature in rock.

Blobby Funisia fossils.

Scott Evans/American Museum of Natural History

As a result, the new site provides compelling fossil evidence that the earliest animals first emerged in deep-sea environments, says Lidya Tarhan, a paleontologist at Yale University, who was not involved in the new study. She says the fossils support previous hypotheses that proposed that early life gradually moved from the deep to the shallows, a trajectory that is “unusual in the evolutionary history of animals.”

Although the ocean’s perpetually cold and dark lower reaches may seem inhospitable, Evans notes that the deep sea has less variation in temperature and available oxygen than shallow environments. “That stability might have been a really great place for animals to first show up and evolve,” Evans says. “If you can figure out one temperature, you’re good to go.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe