New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The largest-ever satellite of its kind just unfurled its wings in low-Earth orbit

BlueBird 6 features the biggest commercial communications array antenna ever deployed in orbit around Earth, spanning some 2,400 square feet

The Earth with multiple large satellites orbiting it.

Courtesy of AST SpaceMobile

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The largest-ever communications satellite of its kind took a major step toward operation Tuesday: operator AST SpaceMobile announced the record-breaking spacecraft, whimsically called BlueBird 6, has successfully unfolded its humongous antenna.

Spanning some 2,400 square feet (223 square meters), it is the largest commercial communications array antenna ever deployed in low-Earth orbit. AST SpaceMobile hopes it will be the first of many: the Texas-based public company has six smaller satellites already operating in low-Earth orbit, with plans for scores more behemoths like BlueBird 6. Ultimately these will form a cellular broadband network aimed specifically at smartphones.

BlueBird 6 is huge. Whereas Starlink satellites are about the size of a large table and have an array that extends about 100 feet, BlueBird 6’s array spans an area a little shy of a doubles tennis court. It is also very bright, says Peter Plavchan, an associate professor of physics and astronomy at George Mason University, who is not involved with the satellite company.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“These satellites are going to be so bright that they will be easily visible to the eye,” he says, more luminous than Saturn. Having such bright, numerous manmade objects in the sky means that ground-based astronomy—whether professional or amateur—will ultimately be affected, he says.

“The view of our sky is changing,” Plavchan says. “Even in dark-sky locations now, things are going to look different.”

Samantha Lawler, an associate professor of astronomy at the University of Regina, agrees, stressing that objects so bright will muddy astronomy—and more.

“Having many of these satellites in the sky will be detrimental to astronomy research, devastating for naked-eye observers and could even cause serious issues for migratory birds and other animals that navigate by the stars,” Lawler says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe