The Most Mercurial Field of All

Ultracold atomic systems are pushing the boundaries of known physics and may even set the stage for quantum computing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In early March, Scientific American put the finishing touches on a very exciting collector’s edition entitled “Quantum Universe,” due out on newsstands at the end of April (not so subtle sales pitch there). In assembling and editing the diverse articles for that issue, I came to notice a common theme in the field of quantum physics: the sense that our grasp, from an observational standpoint, of the quantum universe is tenuous and fleeting—the second you try to observe entanglement, the wave function collapses. Because of this phenomenon, researchers are desperate to devise new ways to gather quantum measurements. And so the discipline of ultracold quantum physics has proved a very satisfying direction of research. As Karmela Padavic-Callaghan writes in this issue’s cover story, investigators can manipulate superchilled atoms and use them as models for quantum systems (see “The Coolest Physics You’ve Ever Heard Of”). Having such control over a quantum experiment is gratifying.

Elsewhere in this issue, planetary scientist Carolyn Porco gives an account of corresponding with Carl Sagan about capturing an image of Earth from space (see “How the Celebrated ‘Pale Blue Dot’ Image Came to Be”), and Nola Taylor Redd reports on another compelling galactic image: two merging black holes that are sending whorls of dust and gas into view (see “Meet ‘Spikey,’ a Possible Pair of Merging Supermassive Black Holes”). Some things in the universe are very concrete indeed.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 3 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Most Mercurial Field of All” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 3 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042020-4vzpMJRXR0vte4zrdBXm7V

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe