New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

5 Charts Show Climate Progress as Paris Agreement Turns 10

The 2015 Paris Agreement forged a path for the world to stave off the worst climate change scenarios. Here’s where we stand 10 years later

Image shows crops of five climate-themed charts.

Amanda Montañez

Ten years ago the world came together to forge a path out of the climate emergency in the form of a global treaty dubbed the Paris Agreement.

Under the accord, nations committed to keeping global temperatures to “well below” a two-degree-Celsius increase over preindustrial levels and to striving to limit that increase to 1.5 degrees C. These goals were ambitious and required greenhouse gas emissions to begin declining by 2025.

Yet emissions continue to rise. Annual negotiations around seeing the Paris Agreement through have continued over the past two weeks at this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Brazil, where participants are acknowledging two simultaneous truths: we have made meaningful strides in protecting our planet, but huge leaps are still needed to avoid the worst outcomes. Those leaps are daunting, given that President Donald Trump is once again pulling the U.S. out of the accord and that countries such as China and Saudi Arabia are also still trying to keep fossil fuels in the energy mix. China, however, is rapidly overtaking the U.S. as a renewable energy powerhouse, and solar and wind have seen exponential gains globally in recent years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These five charts show why the Paris Agreement is vital—and how the world is doing 10 years into the endeavor.

Bar chart shows annual global temperature anomalies from 1900 to 2025 compared with the preindustrial period.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Copernicus Climate Change Service (1900–2024 data); World Meteorological Organization (2025 projection)

The Paris Agreement is built around temperature increases compared with an unspecified preindustrial baseline, generally taken as the latter half of the 19th century. Every year since 1970—more than half a century—temperatures have been above this average and soaring upward.

In 2015 the average global temperature was 1.1 degrees C hotter than it was during the preindustrial period. Today it is around 1.3 degrees C. (In 2024—the hottest year on record—the planet was more than 1.5 degrees C, but the Paris agreement looks at the average over many years. The World Meteorological Organization projects that 2025 will be around 1.4 degrees C above the preindustrial average and either the second or third hottest year on record.)

The increase is grim but not the end of the story—especially if humans can stop climate pollution quickly enough to reverse the warming trend. “Every ton matters; every tenth of a degree we avoid matters; every year matters,” says Costa Samaras, an energy policy expert at Carnegie Mellon University.

Chart shows 2015 and 2025 estimates for global temperature rise by 2100 compared with the preindustrial period.

In fact, before the Paris Agreement, the world was set to see between 3.7 and 4.8 degrees C of warming by 2100. But if nations follow through on their Paris commitments to reduce emissions, that level of warming will drop to around 2.9 degrees C, with a likely range of 2.3 to 3.4 degrees C, according to one recent estimate.

It’s still a steep challenge to follow through even on the Paris road map, however—and its goals permit some spewing of carbon pollution into the atmosphere.

“Until global emissions are at net zero,” Samaras says, “the climate outcomes of tomorrow are going to be worse than today.”

Line chart shows actual or projected annual number of hot days associated with different global warming scenarios in a selection of nine highly populated countries.

Those climate outcomes could be dire, though not as dire as those that would occur on our pre-Paris track. New research shows that with around four degrees C of warming, U.S. residents would see some 118 more extremely hot days than would occur under a preindustrial climate by the end of the century. (Other nations would fare even worse.)

If we achieve the current commitments to reduce emissions, the number of days with the worst heat in 2100 will drop to 88 in the U.S. If we can limit global warming to 1.3 degrees C, the U.S. will see just 58 such days per year on average.

Chart shows how many more extreme climate events people of different current ages may experience compared with those living in the preindustrial period.

Of course, even if we follow through on current commitments, there will be climate consequences regardless. With 2.6 degrees C of warming, today’s five-year-olds will experience an extra 22 percent more heat waves than today’s 15-year-olds, work by climate scientist Wim Thiery of Vrije University of Brussels shows. Similarly, today’s children will experience more than twice as many heat waves than their 35-year-old parents will—and more than six times as many as their 65-year-old grandparents.

Other climate-fueled disasters, including droughts, wildfires and tropical cyclones, are also increasing in frequency.

Area chart shows annual global electricity generation by source from 2015 to 2025.

Amanda Montañez; Source: International Energy Agency (data)

One of the key bright spots since the Paris Agreement was signed is the surge of renewable energy. A particular win has been that solar power facilities are coming online much faster than anyone expected in 2015. Better yet, energy from these facilities is being stored for nighttime use thanks to battery technology that was nonexistent when the Paris Agreement was signed. “Batteries is really the miracle story here,” Samaras says.

Now we need a similar miracle story for sectors such as transportation, agriculture, industry and land use. “I hope that we can revisit this in 10 years and be able to say that the Paris Agreement started a rapid reduction in greenhouse gas emissions,” Samaras says. “But we need to work for the next 10 years in order to make that happen.”

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe