New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These Male Stick Insects Aren’t ‘Errors’ After All

Some female stick insects can reproduce without males—but they have a secret

A green insect on green leaf, shown against a back background.

Timema poppense, a species related to the stick insects studied in the new work.

Moritz Muschick/University of Sheffield

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Certain wingless, sticklike insects that hide in bushes and trees across central California have no need for males: these insects in the Timema genus are nearly all female and reproduce without sex by creating genetic clones of themselves, a process called parthenogenesis.

But entomologists occasionally stumble on male Timema insects, which seem to have no reproductive function. “We initially assumed that the males were just errors, as loss of a single X chromosome can result in an egg developing into a male,” says ecologist Susana Freitas, who led the study while working at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland.

Freitas and her team found that the uncommon males may engage in infrequent flings with the females. This “cryptic sex” introduces genetic diversity into stick insect populations and might aid their long-term survival. The team's genetic analysis was recently published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Parthenogenesis (meaning “virgin birth”) is common among invertebrates and even occurs in some species of birds, lizards and snakes. For some, it's a last resort when mating options are limited; for others, it's their only method of reproduction. But creating offspring through cloning results in low genetic diversity, leaving a population vulnerable to harmful mutations and limiting its ability to adapt to environmental changes.

To examine the genetic diversity of the stick insects, researchers extracted DNA from females and rare males in eight Timema populations across four species. They then tracked the position of various genetic markers in each insect. These markers stay linked on chromosomes during asexual reproduction but are reshuffled with another individual's genes during sexual reproduction.

Most offspring genetically resembled their female parents. But offspring in two Timema species showed greater genetic diversity and fewer linked genes, indicating cryptic sexual relations. Tellingly, the genetic profiles of the uncommon males matched what would be expected from a rare sexual encounter.

The discovery “reinforces the hypothesis that many of the species previously thought to be anciently asexual in fact engage in sexual reproduction or other forms of genetic exchange,” says Olga Vakhrusheva, an evolutionary biologist at the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology in Moscow, who was not involved in the new work.

These rare interactions, also known to occur among small crustaceans and water invertebrates, “could be helping to wash away any deleterious mutations,” says Alexis L. Sperling, a crop scientist at the University of Cambridge, who also was not involved in the new study. She notes that many agricultural pests such as aphids, wasps and flies reproduce asexually. Cryptic sex or similar strategies could help these pests thrive, Sperling suggests— “but we need more research to be sure.”

Saugat Bolakhe is a freelance science journalist. He studied zoology as an undergraduate in Nepal and received a master’s degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York. His work has appeared in Scientific American, Nature, New Scientist, Quanta, Eos, Discover, Knowable and other publications.

More by Saugat Bolakhe
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Cryptic Sex” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 5 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1223-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe