New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

This Sponge Captures the Teeny Bits of Gold in Electronic Waste

A self-building sponge that efficiently collects gold could eliminate some harsh methods used to process e-waste

Illustration of cell phone with gold sponge

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If all 62 million metric tons of electronic waste the world produces in a year were loaded into garbage trucks, they’d encircle the planet bumper to bumper, according to a recent United Nations report. And hidden in that monstrous traffic jam would be startling amounts of precious metals, including gold—crucial in electronics because it conducts electricity, stretches into wires and won’t easily corrode. Modern iPhones have gold in their cameras, circuit boards and USB-C connectors. Pound for pound, there is more of the substance in cell phones than in ore from a typical gold mine.

But wringing precious metals from trashed electronics is a harsh business. Using en­ergy-­in­tens­ive smelters, recycling facilities process e-waste with punishing heat. Or caustic agents are used to break down bulk electronics into liquids full of metal ions. This approach then requires complex electrochemical processes and toxic treatments to extract valuable elements in their metallic forms. The search for environmentally friendlier methods that skip those additional steps has led materials scientists down some unusual alleyways. For instance, an aerogel made from whey protein—a cheese by-­product—can capture gold ions from computer motherboards bathed in acid.

An experimental sponge, described in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, combines graphene oxide (a thin sheet of carbon and oxygen molecules) with chitosan, a sugar derived from shrimp shells, to strain out gold. Because chitosan spontaneously attaches to the carbon sheet, the sponge essentially builds itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In their initial experiments, the study authors used the sponge to filter water that contained gold ions. The pale yellow liquid became clear as gold particles piled up in the material’s molecular mesh. Once there, the ions reacted with the chitosan, which, as a natural reducing agent, helped to transform the gold back into its metallic form.

Scanning electron microscope image of Au3+ extraction and reduction by GO/Chitosan sponge. Au3+ is shown in yellow

Gold (yellow) nestles in a graphene-chitosan sponge.

Kou Yang

The researchers also tested the sponge on partially processed e-waste; when they increased the acidity of the liquid to a pH of 3, the sponge’s chitosan captured the remaining gold while ignoring other metals. Although it requires an acidic environment to work, the sponge could eliminate the need for further pro­cessing, which can rely on poisonous substances such as cyanide to obtain metallic gold from liquids. “Our method allows for efficient recovery of gold directly from the waste mixture,” say study co-­authors Daria Andreeva-Baeumler and Konstantin Novoselov, materials scientists at the National University of Singapore.

The new material is one of the most potent gold adsorbers ever created. (“Adsorption” is similar to the more familiar “absorption,” but adsorbed things accumulate on surfaces, whereas absorbed things are internalized. It’s the difference between a mustard glob on your chin and the hot dog you just ate.) The sponge collected up to 99.5 percent of the gold by weight from liquids with gold concentrations as low as three parts per million.

“To the best of my knowledge, this is a record-high value,” says ETH Zürich physicist Raffaele Mezzenga, an author of the whey protein aerogel study, who wasn’t involved with the graphene-chitosan research. He notes that as efficient as the sponge is, the components needed to make it aren’t cheap, and he questions whether it would be a workable option “under real operating conditions.” Adapting the technique for industrial-scale use, Novoselov and Andreeva-­Baeumler say, “is indeed the next step in our research.”

Ben Guarino is a freelance journalist with a soft spot for big ideas and tiny critters. He was formerly an associate technology editor at Scientific American. He wrote and edited stories about artificial intelligence, robotics and our relationship with our tools. Previously, he worked as a science editor at Popular Science and a staff writer at the Washington Post, where he covered the COVID pandemic, science policy and misinformation (and also dinosaur bones and water bears). He has a degree in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania and a master's degree from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Ben Guarino
Scientific American Magazine Vol 332 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Sponging for Gold” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 332 No. 1 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012025-xi8Sk8vvDGksW0uMOtF7u

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe