U.S. lawmakers vote to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress

Fauci previously served as the chief medical officer to President Joe Biden and led the U.S. COVID pandemic response effort

Fauci with microphone
Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, during a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. Fauci declined to testify in a Senate committee hearing on his role in the US response to Covid-19, invoking his 5th Amendment rights.
Al Drago/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A Senate committee voted 8-5 to hold Anthony Fauci, the former chief medical officer to the president, in contempt of Congress.

The vote came after a fiery July 29 hearing in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Committee chair Sen. Rand Paul released more than 1,000 pages of the personal diary Fauci kept during the COVID pandemic. Fauci had been subpoenaed by the committee to answer questions about the origins of the pandemic and the government's response. The long-time infectious disease expert declined to answer the committee's questions, citing his right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

"Dr. Fauci faced no risk of federal prosecution," committee chair Sen. Rand Paul said before the vote on Thursday, pointing to former President Joe Biden's preemptive pardon of Fauci in January 2025. "All he had to do was tell the truth. More than 100 times, though, he refused."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In his opening statement on July 29, Fauci said that he had testified before or briefed Senate and House committees "well over 200 times" during his 38-year tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In that role, he steered the U.S. COVID pandemic response alongside both President Donald Trump, then in his first term of office, and President Joe Biden.

"During and after the COVID pandemic, I have appeared multiple times for hearings in the Senate and the House, usually under oath, and sat for several days-long transcribed sworn interviews, answering questions about the very issues that are now the subject of this hearing," Fauci said, adding that he believed Sen. Paul had released his personal diary entries in order to intimidate him.

Paul has said following the vote on Thursday that he'd pass the matter to the Justice Department for further action.

Despite initially working alongside Trump in the first months of the COVID pandemic, Fauci has since become a frequent target of the president and Republican lawmakers. Sen. Paul has repeatedly accused Fauci of covering up the origins of the pandemic, while others criticized his support of lockdowns and shifting public health messaging on masks and immunity.

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe