Weight-Loss Surgery Alters the Brain

Changes in neural activity may help explain why gastric bypass is so effective

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In June, international diabetes organizations endorsed provocative new guidelines suggesting physicians should consider gastric bypass surgery for a greatly expanded number of diabetics—those with a body mass index of 30 and above as opposed to just those with a BMI of 40 or more. Research has shown that the surgery helps people lose more weight, maintain the loss longer and achieve better blood glucose levels than those who slim down by changing diet and exercise habits. Now a study in mice suggests the effectiveness of bariatric surgery may stem in part from changes it causes in the brain.

According to the study, published in the International Journal of Obesity, gastric bypass surgery causes the hyperactivation of a neural pathway that leads from stomach-sensing neurons in the brain stem to the lateral parabrachial nucleus, an area in the midbrain that receives sensory information from the body, and then to the amygdala, the brain's emotion- and fear-processing center.

The obese mice underwent so-called Roux-en-Y bypass surgery, in which surgeons detach most of the stomach, leaving only a tiny pouch connected to the small intestine. Shortly after the surgery, the mice begin to show increased activation in this neural pathway, along with reduced meal size and a preference for less fatty food. They also begin to secrete higher levels of satiety hormones. Similar behavioral and hormonal patterns are found in humans after bypass surgery, suggesting that the brain changes may also be similar—but the authors say looking at this particular circuit in humans with brain imaging is difficult because the resolution is not up to the task.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to senior author Hans-Rudolf Berthoud of L.S.U.'s Pennington Biomedical Research Center, the change in brain activity is probably caused by the sudden novel contact of undigested food hitting the small intestine rather than the predigested mix that usually comes from the stomach. “These patients basically have to relearn how to eat. They were used to large portions and wolfed the food down. It was pleasurable for them. But if they do that after surgery, that hurts them,” Berthoud says. The brain areas made hyperactive by the surgery probably reflect this new negative feedback, which is a powerful learning tool.

In a few weeks the pathway was no longer hyperactive in the mice, perhaps indicating that the brain recruited other processes to support reduced eating, Berthoud says. He adds that this pathway is probably only a small piece of the puzzle. Past studies suggest that bariatric surgery also affects the brain's reward system, making fatty foods less pleasurable. One question that remains is why bypass surgery does not lead to the frustratingly slow metabolism seen in people who lose large amounts of weight by drastic lifestyle changes. In a much publicized study earlier this year, researchers found that contestants on the television show The Biggest Loser still had a sluggish metabolism six years after their giant weight loss. Bariatric patients, according to similar studies, achieve a stable, normalized metabolism within a year.

Gastric bypass surgery is not without risks or side effects, of course. Yet as the studies pile up showing that weight loss from dieting is nearly impossible to maintain long term, Berthoud and other researchers hope to keep elucidating bariatric surgery's pros and cons. “This is a very complex story,” he says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe