New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why Scientists Are Making Kill Switches for GMOs

A genetic kill switch could prevent industrial espionage and environmental contamination

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Untold numbers of genetically modified Escherichia coli bacteria live in vats around the world, churning out useful things such as medical insulin, plastic polymers and food additives. When the reprogrammed bugs have served their role, they are packed away as industrial waste or repurposed for fertilizer.

This arrangement currently poses little environmental risk because genetically modified E. coli is weak compared with its wild cousins; it would not survive for long outside the lab. But engineered bugs not yet invented might go where they are not wanted and create risks. What if, say, an accident released more resilient engineered bugs that took over a well-balanced ecosystem? Or if tweaked bacteria shared modifications such as antibiotic resistance with their counterparts in nature through horizontal gene transfer? Or if a rival firm stole a patented bacterium for the trade secrets encoded in its DNA? Scientists are developing fail-safes for such contingencies.

In 2009 Brian Caliando, a bioengineer then at the University of California, San Francisco, began working on a way to ensure that a genetically modified organism's engineered DNA could be destroyed before a bug could escape or be stolen. He had recently read about CRISPR, a newly discovered defense tactic bacteria use to cut up and destroy DNA from invading viruses, and realized that he could use it like a built-in kill switch for genetically modified bacteria.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Caliando, under Christopher Voigt, first at U.C.S.F. and then at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, developed DNAi, a CRISPR-based system that compels bacteria to chop up their own modified DNA. Using CRISPR, Caliando programmed plasmids—tiny circles of autonomously replicating DNA—to code for the RNA bases and enzymes that form the kill switch. He then inserted those plasmids into genetically modified E. coli, where they boot up and infect the bacteria with their deadly program. Adding a sugar called arabinose to the vat throws the kill switch, and the DNAi device begins slicing up the bacteria's genetically modified DNA.

Caliando's work, published in Nature Communications this year, is a proof of concept. The same principles could be adapted to fit a variety of organisms and conditions. For example, he says, DNAi could prevent genetically modified organisms from cross-pollinating nearby fields.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe