New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Yellowstone’s earthquakes spark microbial boom deep underground

Earthquake swarms can supercharge microbial growth

Steam rising from thermal hot springs and geysers. Bison grazing.

A swarm of 2,182 earthquakes at Yellowstone National Park was key for a new finding about microbes.

Cheryl Ramalho/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With some luck, specialized equipment, a supervolcano and a narrow hole 30 stories deep, researchers demonstrated that earthquakes shake up more than just rocks—they also boost microbe populations living underground.

Up to 30 percent of life on Earth doesn’t ever see sunlight; instead these organisms get energy by chowing down on hydrogen generated through chemical interactions between water and rocks. Earthquakes fracture rocks, creating fresh reaction surfaces and shifting the pathways water travels along, which increase hydrogen production. For a study in PNAS Nexus, researchers tracked the effects of such shake-ups on microbes at the bottom of a 100-meter-deep borehole in Yellowstone National Park.

The scientists made a 10-hour round-trip trek to and from the test site seven times over seven months. There they collected samples of rock, dissolved gas and microbes, overcoming equipment malfunctions, logistical difficulties, and more along the way. The group was lucky enough to be taking measurements at just the right time—and in the ideal location—to perfectly catch the rise and fall of a rare “swarm” of 2,182 earthquakes. Yellowstone endures a lot of earthquakes, but swarms this powerful tend to occur every five to 10 years, says Montana State University geomicrobiologist Eric Boyd, the study’s lead author.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


During the swarm, the amount of microbial life present increased by 6.5 times before dropping back to normal after the tremors subsided. Hydrogen levels also increased, and the types of microbes observed changed. “All the pieces fit together nicely,” Boyd says. “We put all of these data together, and we’re like, holy cow!”

The results might offer clues for finding life thriving under otherworldly surfaces, too. “Extrapolation to other planets and moons suggests that subsurface life might be most easily found in seismically active locations,” says Steven D’Hondt, who studies below-seafloor life at the University of Rhode Island and was not involved with the work. “It’s a wonderful study,” he adds.

Caroline Freissinet, an astrobiologist at French research institute LATMOS who was not involved with the work, says that although it’s a great result for understanding Earth, the study is unlikely to change much about the search for life on our nearest neighboring planet, Mars, because of its “hellish subsurface conditions.”

“Mars in the past was wetter,” she says, “but what would be left today of this temporarily enhanced activity, four billion years later?”

The Yellowstone study was “a really difficult project but a really meaningful one,” Boyd says. “Nobody had done this before.” He’s now working on developing an automated sampler triggered by earthquakes to dramatically increase data collection.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe