29 Bullet Points Tell All About Climate Challenge

The results are in. Yesterday the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released it final report crystallizing 13 months of work by more than 800 scientists.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The results are in. Yesterday the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released it final report crystallizing 13 months of work by more than 800 scientists. The “synthesis report” gives a no-nonsense assessment of how the climate is changing, what is causing the change, the impacts the changes will have on us and the planet, and the “mitigation” steps we should take to prevent the impacts from getting worse. The recommendations are intended first and foremost for national leaders, who in 2015 will make what may be a last-chance effort to reach a binding global climate treaty.

Although the report’s authors try to give a condensed snapshot of the most important data and recommendations, the document still clocks in at 116 pages. I will attempt, here, to capture what you need to know most, in 29 bullets. Forgive the staccato.

Climate changes:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • The atmosphere is getting hotter.

  • The oceans are getting much hotter, and much more acidic.

Causes:

  • CO2 emissions are by far the largest cause of global warming and ocean acidification, and they are rising.

  • Methane emissions are the second largest cause of warming, and they are rising.

  • Since 1950 human activities have led to virtually all temperature rise.

  • Natural forces have caused virtually none of the temperature rise.

  • The largest human sources of CO2 emissions are burning fossil fuels, making cement and burning off gas (“flaring”) from oil and gas production.

Impacts:

  • Sea level is rising, and at an increasing pace.

  • Glaciers are melting, ice sheets are thinning, and Arctic sea ice is disappearing.

  • Permafrost is thawing.

  • In North America, snow pack is decreasing.

  • The number of cold days and nights are decreasing.

  • The number of hot days and nights are increasing.

  • Heat waves will occur more often and last longer.

  • Heavy rainstorms and snowstorms will become more intense and frequent.

  • Overall, precipitation will rise in high latitudes and the equatorial Pacific. In mid-latitudes, dry areas will get drier, wet areas will get wetter.

  • Species are vanishing at an alarming and ever-increasing rate.

  • Most plants, small mammals and ocean organisms cannot adapt fast enough to keep up with changes.

  • Global temperature rise greater than 2 degrees Celsius will compromise food supplies globally.

  • Human health problems will get worse.

  • Risks to poorer people are greater than for others, in all countries.

What to do:

  • To avoid severe damage to natural and human systems, the world should keep global warming to less than 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels.

  • Without more mitigation than is being done today, the temperature is more likely than not to rise by 4 degrees C by 2100.

  • Significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 can significantly reduce warming by 2100.

  • Keeping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere below the equivalent of 450 parts per million of CO2 can keep warming below 2 degrees C.

  • Levels are likely to stay below 450 ppm if human emissions are reduced 40 to 70 percent by 2050 compared with 2010 levels.

  • Allowing levels to reach 530 ppm by 2100 gives the planet slightly better than 50-50 odds of staying below 2C; that would require reducing emissions 25 to 55 percent by 2050 versus 2010.

  • To hit a target of 430 to 530 ppm by 2100, the world must invest several hundred billion dollars a year in low-carbon electricity sources and energy efficiency.

  • It is highly unlikely the world will stay below 450 ppm without widespread use of carbon capture and storage technologies.

So…improve technical solutions, reach government agreements, and fund them, now.

Photo courtesy of purites on Flickr

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe