Flip-Flop Summer Caused by Strange Jet Stream

By now, if you live in the northeastern U.S. you have heard or even said the following:  "This summer has been so cool. I love it." Or: "This summer has been so cool.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


By now, if you live in the northeastern U.S. you have heard or even said the following: “This summer has been so cool. I love it.” Or: “This summer has been so cool. I hate it.” Yet if you live in Oregon or Washington, you’ve heard the opposite: “It’s been so hot this year!”

Maybe people just like to complain? Nope. The data is in and headlines are everywhere the past few days: temperatures across the Northeast have been unusually cool, and they have been unusually hot across the northwest. Boston typically hits 90 degrees Fahrenheit on about 15 different days of the year, but so far it has only reached that mark four times. Washington, D.C. , had hit the century mark 16 times by August 15, which might sound like a lot until you learn that the average by that date is 29. Meanwhile, Portland, Ore., has sweated 90 degrees F 12 times already; that usually happens just a few times a year.

A strange jet stream is behind the flip-flop between summer conditions in the two northern corners of the country. The polar jet stream is the prevailing band of wind that blows west to east across the upper half of the U.S. in summer. (There is a subtropical jet, also, that typically crosses northern Mexico). We often see the jet stream depicted on TV weather reports—that big, wavy line across the U.S. and Canada that bends south then north then south again. Low-pressure weather systems, sometimes called cold fronts, ride along the jet stream, bringing us much of our daily weather. But this summer the polar jet steam seems to be somewhat flattened out, and it’s been in that position more than usual. Meteorologist Dylan Dreyer of NBC’s Today show summed it up nicely in a short segment I happened to see this morning. Watch the video below, if you like.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Data from the National Weather Service, and headlines from numerous states, reflect the flattened jet stream Dreyer shows in the video. In addition to the Northeast, middle-American cities from Chicago to Dallas and even further west to Denver have all had fewer hot days. So what could make the jet stream flat? A combination of forces in the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean come into play day to day, but those factors themselves may be changing due to climate change. Several studies published in the last two years in leading journals have indicated that the jet stream’s waviness may be becoming more extreme, and it may be getting stuck in those patterns for longer periods of time.

In the winter, “extreme” often means an even larger, sharper curve than usual—bringing the infamous polar vortex down from the Arctic, for example. But this summer, extreme seems to mean flatter. A study led by S.-Y. Simon Wang at Utah State University, published in April in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, noted that the extremes have been made more likely because of climate change. As I’ve written before, our changing climate is not so much “global warming” as it is “global weirding.”

We will see, of course, whether this weather pattern holds up for the rest of the summer. But it’s already August 18, and the 10-day forecast for my home town in Masachusetts shows nothing but high temperatures in the 70s.

Jet stream image courtesy of NOAA

Video courtesy of NBC

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe