Glow Sticks Prove the Math Theorem behind the Famous Flatiron Building

How many math lovers live in New York City? Its a tough count to make, but the Museum of Mathematics made progress at its first anniversary celebration on Thursday, December 5.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


How many math lovers live in New York City? It’s a tough count to make, but the Museum of Mathematics made progress at its first anniversary celebration on Thursday, December 5.

With a mission to illuminate the math that permeates our day-to-day lives, the Museum of Mathematics, or MoMath, wasn’t about to waste its birthday on just another party. But by what founder Glen Whitney calls a “cosmic coincidence,” a date just one week before the museum’s December 12 anniversary held some special mathematic significance.

“Math shows up in ways we don’t realize,” Whitney says, “and the Flatiron building is a great example.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Anyone can see that the iconic building is triangular. But it’s a very special triangle—a 5-12-13 right triangle, illustrating the Pythagorean theorem. It states that one can determine the length of the longest side of a right triangle (the hypotenuse) by adding the squared lengths of the two shorter sides and taking the square root of the result. In other words, as every middle school student learns, a2+b2=c2.

“People celebrate Pi Day on 3-14,” Whitney says, “So we’re celebrating Pythagoras Day on 5-12-13.”

And to celebrate, MoMath enthusiasts came out in full force to honor the museum’s mission—in this case, by literally illuminating a mathematics equation. To prove that the Pythagorean theorem is correct, Whitney had museum members lined up around the building, holding glowsticks end to end so the outline was illuminated. If the theorem is correct, he said, they’d be able to predict the number of glowsticks used on the hypotenuse by counting those used on the other two sides. The 2,000-year-old equation came through, with the glowstick totals coming out to 75, 180, and 195—a perfect example of a2+b2=c2. You can check the math here.

Those 450 participants were just the first to respond (“the most enthusiastic of our math enthusiasts,” Whitney says,), but around 2,000 came out to watch the theorem in action. “We’ve had a great year,” says co-director Cindy Lawrence, “But who would have thought that 2,000 people would come out to celebrate math?”

The crowd of 2,000 was lively, with triangle-themed attire to spare. Paige Breisacher, a 20-something professional who’s been a MoMath member for a year, had right triangles drawn on her face. “Well my favorite triangle is the Sierpinksi triangle,” she says, “but if I can't have that I'll take an ordinary equilateral triangle instead.” But she couldn’t resist joining the event, even though right triangles are only her third favorite.

“That’s what we’re all about,” Whitney says, “Showing that math is fun, and that you can play with it.”

Image credits: MoMath (top 2 images); Rachel Feltman (lower 2 images)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe