Hurricane Humberto Ties Atlantic Record

Since 1941 we have never gone later than Sept. 11 without a hurricane forming in the Atlantic Ocean. So when the National Hurricane Center upgraded Tropical Storm Humberto to a hurricane early Wednesday morning, Humberto tied the Sept.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Since 1941 we have never gone later than Sept. 11 without a hurricane forming in the Atlantic Ocean. So when the National Hurricane Center upgraded Tropical Storm Humberto to a hurricane early Wednesday morning, Humberto tied the Sept. 11 record set by Hurricane Gustav in 2002. Gustav later struck North Carolina. Humberto is currently in the tropics between Africa and the Caribbean and is forecast to drift around in the mid-Atlantic, not making landfall.

This year’s record is odd, however, because conditions in the Atlantic have been ripe for storms.

Usually, fewer hurricanes form in the Atlantic when El Niño conditions are present in the Pacific Ocean, because they tend to set up weather patterns that cause shearing winds over the Atlantic that can cut down tropical storms as they grow. Cool Atlantic water also undermines hurricanes. But 2013 is not an El Niño year and water temperatures have been above average, so more storms should have formed by now. On average, three hurricanes coalesce in the Atlantic by Sept. 9. A typical season, which runs from June 1 to November 30, produces six hurricanes, two of which are strong.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It’s impossible to tell how much water, sun and wind energy exists during the entire six-month season to fuel big storms. Meteorologists use the “accumulated cyclone energy” index as a proxy. ACE is the square of wind speed recorded every six hours in every storm with at least 40 mph sustained winds. Over the past 20 years, ACE has averaged 50 units through Sept. 9, but this year the total was just 9.6 units, according to Jeff Masters, a meteorologist who runs Wunderground.com, a Web site that analyzes and tracks severe weather in great detail. Also strange.

The main reason for the calm, according to Masters, has been a large amount of dry, stable air over the Atlantic, providing less moisture and energy to mounting storms. Much of that air has wafted out over the ocean from the Sahara Desert in Africa. Most Atlantic hurricanes begin as small atmospheric disturbances off the coast of Africa that strengthen as they work their way west and north.

A slow first half of hurricane season is not unusual, however, and it has no bearing on what might happen through the end of November. At least four and as many as nine hurricanes have formed in each of the five years since the 1960s that did not have a hurricane by the end of August. Superstorm Sandy struck the U.S. on Oct. 29 last year. More than 60 percent of Atlantic cyclones form during the second half of the period, so the peak time is just approaching.

As Masters points out on his blog, “the season with the greatest similarity to what we've seen during the first half of the 2013 season was 1988. That year, we also had unusual quietness before September 10, no El Niño, and above average ocean temperatures in the [Atlantic zone where hurricanes form]. But [then] the most powerful Atlantic hurricane ever recorded up to that time ripped through the Caribbean, Hurricane Gilbert, as well as two other major hurricanes.”

And as forecasters at the National Weather Service often say, it only takes one bad storm hitting land to make a bad season.

By the way, in 1941 the date for the first hurricane is Sept. 16, but it may be hard to say how conclusive that record and earlier ones are. The famous Hurricane Hunters began systematically flying over the Atlantic in 1944, and satellite surveillance began in 1960.

Image courtesy of NOAA

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe