Now You Can "Hear" Climate Change [Video]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Want a visceral sense of how much temperatures around the Northern Hemisphere are deviating from average? Well, have a listen. University of Minnesota geography student and super cello player Daniel Crawford has composed a two-and-a-half minute piece for string quartet that let’s you hear the temperature change from 1880 to 2014. The tones in the early years feel placid and regular but from 1950 on they depart more from the norm, and they become notably scattered from the 1990s through 2014.

The sound of climate change from the Amazon to the Arctic from Ensia on Vimeo.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the video, titled Planetary Bands, Warming World, each instrument represents a region of the hemisphere. The cello plays the data from the equatorial zone, the viola the mid-latitudes, one violin the high latitudes and another violin the Arctic. The pitch of each note represents the average annual temperature of the region for the relevant year. For example, a high note on the violin means warm weather in the Arctic; a low note on the cello means cold weather along the equator. Blend all four, and you can hear how temperatures fluctuate across the hemisphere and how much they have risen.

Crawford partnered with geography professor Scott St. George to create a video of the composition, performed by students Julian Maddox, Jason Shu, Alastair Witherspoon and Nygel Witherspoon at the university’s School of Music. As the four artists, seated left to right facing the viewer, play the piece the years tick by below them in time with the notes, and the temperature of each of the zones scrolls by above the musician, along with a slick little graphic that swings up and down to show the relative change year to year.

I met Crawford two years ago at a climate meeting, where he unveiled a solo composition he had done just for cello, based on the same data. To hear a brief Q&A with him, and to hear him play his original composition, A Song for Our Warming Planet, which he did privately for me the day he announced it, you can listen to my podcast from August 2013.

Credits: Support for the video was provided by the University of Minnesota Institute on the Environment and the College of Liberal Arts. The video was produced by Mighteor

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe