Which sperm will win the race to the egg: the green one or the red one?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Once they're inside the female reproductive organs, sperm pull out all the stops to outrace their rivals to the egg—especially if the opponent comes from another male. The process that determines which sperm wins, called "postcopulatory sexual selection," has been difficult to tease out, until now.

By genetically engineering fruit flies that express green or red fluorescent (glow-in-the-dark) proteins in their sperm heads, researchers from Syracuse University have made the race to the egg spectator-friendly. These glowing sperm can be detected through the female fruit flies' reproductive organs, allowing the fierce competition to be watched in real time through a special microscope. "Our jaws hit the floor the first time we looked through a microscope and saw these glowing sperm," lead author Scott Pitnick said in a prepared statement. "It turns out that they are constantly on the move within the female's specialized sperm-storage organs and exhibit surprisingly complex behavior."

The study, published March 18 in Science, sheds new light on postcopulatory sexual selection—a "powerful force for evolutionary change," according to Pitnick. When a female mates with more than one male (a common practice in fruit flies and other species), postcopulatory sexual selection is what drives paternity. The researchers conclude that the timing of sperm release from female storage organs, the distribution of competing sperm, "fair raffle" sperm use (meaning no sperm favoritism from the female or the environment) and the "surprising level of sperm mobility" all influence postcopulatory sexual selection.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So who wins? Although every sperm moves through female storage organs at about the same pace, the sperm from the most recent mate tends to oust those from earlier mates. The study corroborates previous reports that so-called "second-male" sperm can displace "first-male" sperm, but does not suggest that sperm can incapacitate their competitors (in contrast to earlier reports of "killer" or "kamikaze" sperm).

The ability to watch previously unobservable events occurring between insemination and fertilization might have huge implications for the fields of reproductive biology, sexual selection and speciation. "I suspect we have just scratched the surface of using this material," Pitnick says.

Top image of the reproductive tract (less ovaries) of female D. melanogaster initially mated to GFP-sperm male then remated to RFP-sperm male. Green sperm heads have left the storage organs and can be seen mixing with red sperm heads in the bursa. Bottom image of the seminal receptacle (SR) and one spermatheca of a female D. melanogaster initially mated to GFP-sperm male then remated to RFP-sperm male. Sperm are mixed in the SR, yet only green sperm reside in the spermatheca. Images © Science/AAAS

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe