Producing Scientific American Infographics in the Era of Big Data

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Nigel Holmes on Big Data

Courtesy of Nigel Holmes (nigelholmes.com). An illustration on infographics, developed for "Infografics. A visual definition"

Big Data large and often complicated data sets that thwart quick analysis remained a key phrase at the World Infographics Summit last month. But the buzz that surrounded that phrase seemed measured and in control. Experts of data visualization have emerged, and they come bearing elegant examples of what works, clumsy examples of what doesn t, lessons learned, blogs and even a podcast.

With two consecutive years as a summit participant, I’m a relative newbie on the scene. Hosted by the Spanish chapter of the Society for News Design and the School of Communication at the University of Navarra, the week of workshops, lectures, awards and conversations held annually in Pamplona, Spain, is collectively known as Malofiej (named after the Argentinian infographics artist Alejandro Malofiej). This was a banner year the 20th anniversary attracting more than 200 participants from around the world.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year I recalled a sense of urgency swirling around the conference. How to parse through all the data pouring down? What programming languages to use? Would the iPad change everything? How (or should) infographics try to make sense of the data points swirling about in social media? My lecture notes include definitions, categories and tool suggestions. What is an infographic? What is a data visualization? Define, divide and conquer. Anything to help me make sense of the increasing demand for graphics that digest and make sense of large amounts of data.

This year, many of the talks orbited around the idea of beauty. Craft. Minimalism. Clarity of thought, intent and delivery. The emphasis, to my mind, shifted subtly from efficiency of task, to the editorial process with the ultimate goal of producing a thing of beauty.

The definitions and categories I had dutifully noted last year were condensed. Information is data. Data is information. Whether the end product is a beautifully painted reconstruction of a dinosaur or a clean numerical chart, the goal is the same: create a visual that helps explain a process, concept, event or state.

Big data, after all, isn t new to our magazine s readers. Infinity, anyone?

Must Our Universe be Infinite?

From an article by Nicolas P. Rashevsky, Scientific American, September 1925

Scientific American has a long history of working with scientists to help make large data sets understandable literal depictions of the fundamentals of math and numbers (graphic, below), to bigger picture and more figurative visual displays of large data sets (video, below). Working with scientists and artists to help visualize Big Data” is a natural extension of what we’ve been doing all along.

Real and Complex Numbers

Graphic by Brown Bird Design. From "The Strangest Numbers in String Theory" by John C. Baez and John Huerta, Scientific American Magazine, May 2011

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe