Subatomic Particles Over Time: Graphics from the Archive, 1952-2015

In the May issue of Scientific American, a familiar friend makes an appearance: a chart of fundamental particles. These particles—fermions (which include constituents of matter such as electrons and quarks) and bosons (usually carriers of force)—are at the very heart of the Standard Model of particle physics.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In the May issue of Scientific American, a familiar friend makes an appearance: a chart of fundamental particles. These particles–fermions (which include constituents of matter such as electrons and quarks) and bosons (usually carriers of force)–are at the very heart of the Standard Model of particle physics. Visualizing them in table form has become a bit of a tradition here at the magazine, as a way to introduce readers to the cast of characters in articles on the topic, and to provide context for theorized and newly described particles.

Below is a time-ordered series of my favorite particle zoo tables from the Scientific American archive, starting with a comprehensive particle list from 1952, morphing into the discovery-driven Standard Model classifications of the 1970s and beyond. Variation reflects the shifting state of particle physics knowledge over time, different themes addressed by the full articles the tables accompany, and aesthetic trends (influenced by the rendering and print production tools available at the time).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All the particles known as of December, 1951, including fundamental species such as electrons, composite particles, including protons and neutrons (each made of quarks), and theorized particles such as the graviton (which still has not been confirmed): From “The Multiplicity of Particles” by Robert E. Marshak, in Scientific American, January, 1952. Graphic by Sara Love

Graphic by Sara Love

Thirty Particles of 1957: From “Strongly Interacting Particles” by Geoffrey F. Chew, Murray Gell-Mann and Arthur H. Rosenfeld, in Scientific American, February 1964. Graphic by Joan Starwood

Graphic by Joan Starwood

Subatomic particles (top) and quark hypothesis (bottom): From “Electron-Positron Annihilation and the New Particles” by Sidney D. Drell, in Scientific American, June 1975. Graphics by George V. Kelvin

Graphics by George V. Kelvin

Standard model of elementary-particle interactions: From “Gauge Theories of the Forces Between Elementary Particles” by Gerard’t Hooft, in Scientific American, June 1980. Graphic by Gabor Kiss

Graphic by Gabor Kiss

Leptons and Quarks (top) and three forces of nature (bottom): From “A Unified Theory of Elementary Particles and Forces” by Howard Georgi, in Scientific American, April 1981. Graphics by Gabor Kiss

Graphics by Gabor Kiss

Supersymmetry posits that for every ordinary particle there exists a “superpartner”: From “Is Nature Supersymmetric?” by Howard E. Haber and Gordon L. Kane, in Scientific American, June 1986. Graphic by Gabor Kiss

Graphic by Gabor Kiss

The three families of fundamental particles: From “The Number of Families of Matter” by Gary J. Feldman and Jack Steinberger, in Scientific American, February 1991. Graphic by Ian Worpole

Graphic by Ian Worpole

Characters of the Standard Model: From “The Discovery of the Top Quark” by Tony M. Liss and Paul L. Tipton, in Scientific American, September 1997. Graphic by Michael Goodman

Graphic by Michael Goodman

Masses of the particles of the Standard Model: From “The Mysteries of Mass” by Gordon Kane, in Scientific American, July 2005. Graphic by Bryan Christie Design

Graphic by Bryan Christie Design

The basics of particle physics: From “The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics” by Chris Quigg, in Scientific American, February 2008. Graphic by SlimFilms

Graphic by SlimFilms

To learn more about the premise and problems of the Standard Model of particle physics, see the CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) website, “The Dawn of Physics beyond the Standard Model” By Gordon Kane (Scientific American, January 2006), and “Could the Higgs Nobel Be the End of Particle Physics?” By Harry Cliff (October 2013).

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe