This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Boyajian’s star has been caught in the act of dimming again. But lots of stars appear to drop in brightness from our vantage point on Earth. The graphic below, from Kimberly Cartier and Jason Wright’s article in the May 2017 issue of Scientific American, shows why this case is different.
Credit: Tiffany Farrant-Gonzalez; Source: “KIC 8462852 Faded Throughout the Kepler Mission,” by Benjamin T. Montet and Joshua D. Simon, in Astrophyiscal Journal Letters, Vol. 830, No. 2, Article No. L39; October 20, 2016
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
