Visualizing Protein Structures

Early schematics by Jane Richardson lay the foundation for her ubiquitous ribbon diagrams

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Scientific visualization relies heavily on visual jargon. Symbols can carry highly specific information within a specific context, and allow the illustrator to efficiently communicate complex information with others that are fluent in that language. Flip through any science textbook, and you'll see these symbols rolling out along with new concepts. For example, students learn to interpret and use electron orbital diagrams in chemistry, Feynman diagrams in physics, and cladograms in paleontology.

Electron orbital diagrams (Illustration by Jen Christiansen, from “Cracks in the Periodic Table,” by Eric Scerri, in Scientific American, June 2013)

But other than perhaps Feynman diagrams (likely due to the fact that they are named after the person that popularized them), I'm embarrassed to admit that I know very few origin stories of these visual languages. I read or use many of these symbols nearly every day in my job, and yet I don't know the authors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last week—thanks to a tweet by Sonya Tadrowksi—I was virtually introduced to another author. The ribbon diagram for representing protein structures was developed by Jane Richardson, currently the James B. Duke Professor of Biochemistry at Duke University.

As Arthur Olson and David Goodsell put it in the 1992 Scientific American article, “Visualizing Biological Molecules,

"Biochemists often find it enlightening to look at the way a protein chain folds into a compact molecule. Jane S. Richardson of Duke University popularized a simple but effective graphic representation that follows the overall folding of the protein but eliminates the confusing tangle of individual atoms. The resulting ribbon diagram facilitates classifying the many diverse protein structures into a limited number of distinct folding motifs."

Some early details of Richardson’s classification system were published in  "β-sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins." A figure from that paper is shown below.

Figure 1 from "β-sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins"  (Reproduced with permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature, Vol. 268; August 11, 1977).

An annotated web version of Richardson's "The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure" outlines the full classification system (originally published in Advances in Protein Chemistry, Vol. 34, 1981). Also see the slideshow Finding Order, for examples of ribbon diagrams from her lab at Duke.

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe