New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bite Me: The Mutation That Made Corn Kernels Consumable

A single-point mutation in corn's ancestor teosinte got rid of the hard shell that used to encase every kernel 

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nothing says summer like a sweet ear of corn. But that treat would be much harder to eat if it weren’t for a crucial mutation. The change, in just one letter of the DNA code, appears to have cracked the hard casing that covered every kernel in corn’s wild ancestor. That’s according to a study in the journal Genetics. [Huai Wang et al, Evidence That the Origin of Naked Kernels During Maize Domestication Was Caused by a Single Amino Acid Substitution in tga1]

Corn was domesticated from a wild grass called teosinte some 9,000 years ago. But how did our ancestors make maize the agricultural marvel it is today? Seems they selectively propagated plants with a particular mutation—one that made the kernels more accessible to hungry Homo sapiens.

The researchers compared the DNA of 16 varieties of modern corn and 20 types of teosinte. And they found a single, key mutation that is present in modern corn but absent in its wild-grass ancestor. This genetic hiccup disrupts the activity of a protein called tga1.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In teosinte, the tga1 protein directs the formation of a hard shell around every corn kernel. But the modern maize mutation gives tga1 a new set of marching orders. The mutant protein turns the ear inside out, converting the seed cases into a cob that holds all the kernels in place.

When the researchers reversed the effects of the mutant protein, the ancestral seed-case remnants started to reappear.

The results suggest that even minor genetic changes can lead to some pretty tasty developments. You might call it a-maize-ing. But that would be corny.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe