New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dogs Like Motion That Matches Sound

Pet dogs appeared more interested in videos of a bouncing ball when the motion of the ball matched a rising and falling tone. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

You know how in the Road Runner cartoons, whenever something drops—like Wile E. Coyote falling off a cliff—it makes this sound?

[CLIP: Cartoon dropping sound]

“And obviously, if you hear that sound, you assume that something is falling down rather than going up, and this is something we as humans do automatically.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Anna Korzeniowska is an animal behavior scientist at the University of Sussex in the U.K. And she wanted to see whether dogs might also associate falling objects with falling sounds.

“But obviously, we can't ask them.”

So instead she recruited 101 canines—not all dalmatians, if you're wondering. And she had the dogs watch a short video sequence, in the lab, of a blue ball rising and falling on the screen. The video was accompanied by either a corresponding rising and falling tone....

[CIP: Rising and falling sound]

... or the opposite, more counterintuitive pairing of the ball falling with a tone that was rising. 

After running these tests, the researchers analyzed video of the dogs. They coded each frame using a program called Gamebreaker, which is usually used to analyze sports footage. 

And the researchers found that while the dogs spent equal amounts of time looking at both video sequences, they spent a larger proportion of that time tracing the movement of the ball with their heads when the direction of the ball and the sound aligned—perhaps suggesting that they were more engaged when sight seemed to match sound. The results are in the journal Biology Letters. [A. T. Korzeniowska et al., Audio–visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)]

And although we can’t truly know what the dogs were thinking—or whether this behavior really means they find corresponding tones and motion more captivating—it might nevertheless be something for us humans to ponder as we play fetch with Fido. 

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe