New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Grandma's Influence Is Good for Grandkids

Grandmothers can enhance the survival of grandchildren. That is, unless grandma’s too old or lives too far away. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Living with your parents has its benefits…at least when it comes to raising your kids—their grandkids. Because two new studies join the evidence that grandmothers can enhance the survival of grandchildren. That is, unless grandma’s too old or lives too far away. The results appear in the journal Current Biology. [Sacha C. Engelhardt et al., Using Geographic Distance as a Potential Proxy for Help in the Assessment of the Grandmother Hypothesis]

Humans are unusual in that the females live long past the age at which they stop having babies.

“We don’t really see that in nature. Most of the organisms will reproduce up to their very last moment.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Patrick Bergeron, professor of biology at Bishop’s University in Quebec.

This increase in post-reproductive longevity is often explained by the so-called “grandmother effect.

“Because family members share their genes, there could still be a benefit for postmenopausal women to increase their genetic footprint by helping their daughters to rear larger families.”

To explore the “grandmother effect” hypothesis, Bergeron and his colleagues examined nearly 200 years’ worth of French-Canadian population records from the 17th and 18th centuries. 

“At the time, life was tough. In some years, a third of the kids were not even making it to one year of age.”

But the researchers found that having a grandmother still alive was a definite plus. 

“Families with grandmothers alive were larger by about two and the survival of these grandchildren to age 15 was much improved.”

This beneficial effect was only seen when the matriarchs lived nearby. Which suggests that grandmothers help by playing an active role in their grandchildren’s lives. Unfortunately, that role is tougher for them to fulfill as they get older. Which brings us to the second study. [Simon N. Chapman et al., Limits to Fitness Benefits of Prolonged Post-reproductive Lifespan in Women]

Researchers at the University of Turku in Finland used church records from the 18th and 19th centuries. They found that the benefits associated with having a grandmother on hand depended on her age. Once grandma hit 75, the grandchild survival benefit disappeared—and then some. 

“In other words, it was better for grandchildren to have no living grandmother at all than it was to live with an old one or one that was in poor health.”

Simon Chapman, a doctoral student in biology.

“This was almost certainly due to some form of indirect resource competition, though, rather than wickedness on the part of co-resident grandmothers.”

So a healthy grandma helps make for a healthy grandchild. If “over the river and through the woods to grandmother’s house” isn’t too long a trip. 

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe