New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hot Chili Peppers Motivate Mice to Burn Fat

Rodents fed capsaicin voluntarily exercised more than their furry friends on a lower-heat diet. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Looking for a diet that will help you burn fat? Consider the chili. Because capsaicin, the chemical compound that gives chili peppers their kick, appears to prevents weight gain in mice that are fed a high-fat diet. The finding was presented at the Biophysical Society’s annual meeting in Baltimore. [Vivek Krishnan, Kevin Fettel and Baskaran Thyagarajan, Dietary capsaicin and exercise: analysis of a two-pronged approach to counteract obesity]
 
Obesity is caused by an energy imbalance: more calories go in than go out. So, conventional wisdom has it, to tip the scales the other way, you could eat less. Or move more. But maybe there’s a third option.
 
Researchers treated mice to a diet high in fats. But some rats also got a pinch of capsaicin. After 25 weeks, the mice with added spice gained less weight than those on fat alone, even though they ate and drank the same amount. Seems the mice that got the caliente treatment were more likely to get off their rodent rears: they naturally spent more time exercising than their fat-fed counterparts.
 
But before you stock up on chili-flavored Cheetos, keep in mind that mice that ate a well-balanced diet in the first place were the most active and sleek. So feel free to use your Sriracha. But maybe skip the chips.
 
—Karen Hopkin
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe