“Mars-quakes” Could Reveal How Mars Was Built

Rumblings on the Red Planet act like x-rays, allowing scientists to probe the hidden interior of Mars. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just like here on Earth, we have earthquakes, the planet Mars has “Mars-quakes.”

“Although the quakes we see on Mars are actually more similar to the kinds of things we see in the middle of plates. Something that might happen in Montana or South Carolina, for example.”

Bruce Banerdt, a planetary geophysicist at the Jet Propulsion Lab in California. He explains that as the hot center of the planet cools, it slowly shrinks. “So the frozen outer layers, after a while, they’re too big for the rest of the globe, and they have to kind of crinkle to stay contiguous on a shrinking ball.” And that crinkling causes quakes.

NASA’s InSight mission, which landed on the Red Planet about a year ago, placed a seismometer on the planet’s surface to listen for quakes. And it’s captured signals from more than 100—some large enough that you’d feel them if you were standing nearby. Like this magnitude 3.7, recorded back in May.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[CLIP: Marsquake sound in]

It’s been sped up to be audible—and you really need headphones to hear the ferocious rumbling.

[CLIP: Marsquake sound out] 

“We use these signals from Mars-quakes to probe the deep interior of Mars. They work almost like x-rays. They pass through the planet; they bounce off boundaries, like between the crust and the mantle, the way an x-ray bounces off a bone. And we can actually, over time, put together a 3-D image of the inside of a planet, using seismology.”

To accurately read those seismic sounds, though, the researchers have to filter out background noise—such as these “dinks and donks”:

[CLIP: Dinks and donks sample]

The scientists think those sounds might simply be the seismometer creaking as it expands and contracts with daily temperature swings. 

InSight also has another tool, a heat probe, to directly measure the heat seeping out of that slowly cooling core. It’s nicknamed “the Mole,” because it's designed to burrow 16 feet below the Martian surface—although, right now, it’s stuck at just 14 inches deep. 

If the geophysicists can get the Mole to burrow better, it’ll give scientists one more tool to understand the Red Planet’s deep history—maybe even including how Mars and the Earth formed, 4.5 billion years ago—in what must have been a truly Richter-breaking shake-up.

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe