New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

“Mars-quakes” Could Reveal How Mars Was Built

Rumblings on the Red Planet act like x-rays, allowing scientists to probe the hidden interior of Mars. Christopher Intagliata reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just like here on Earth, we have earthquakes, the planet Mars has “Mars-quakes.”

“Although the quakes we see on Mars are actually more similar to the kinds of things we see in the middle of plates. Something that might happen in Montana or South Carolina, for example.”

Bruce Banerdt, a planetary geophysicist at the Jet Propulsion Lab in California. He explains that as the hot center of the planet cools, it slowly shrinks. “So the frozen outer layers, after a while, they’re too big for the rest of the globe, and they have to kind of crinkle to stay contiguous on a shrinking ball.” And that crinkling causes quakes.

NASA’s InSight mission, which landed on the Red Planet about a year ago, placed a seismometer on the planet’s surface to listen for quakes. And it’s captured signals from more than 100—some large enough that you’d feel them if you were standing nearby. Like this magnitude 3.7, recorded back in May.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[CLIP: Marsquake sound in]

It’s been sped up to be audible—and you really need headphones to hear the ferocious rumbling.

[CLIP: Marsquake sound out] 

“We use these signals from Mars-quakes to probe the deep interior of Mars. They work almost like x-rays. They pass through the planet; they bounce off boundaries, like between the crust and the mantle, the way an x-ray bounces off a bone. And we can actually, over time, put together a 3-D image of the inside of a planet, using seismology.”

To accurately read those seismic sounds, though, the researchers have to filter out background noise—such as these “dinks and donks”:

[CLIP: Dinks and donks sample]

The scientists think those sounds might simply be the seismometer creaking as it expands and contracts with daily temperature swings. 

InSight also has another tool, a heat probe, to directly measure the heat seeping out of that slowly cooling core. It’s nicknamed “the Mole,” because it's designed to burrow 16 feet below the Martian surface—although, right now, it’s stuck at just 14 inches deep. 

If the geophysicists can get the Mole to burrow better, it’ll give scientists one more tool to understand the Red Planet’s deep history—maybe even including how Mars and the Earth formed, 4.5 billion years ago—in what must have been a truly Richter-breaking shake-up.

—Christopher Intagliata 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe