New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

May 9 Is Big Day for the Birds

Cornell Lab of Ornithology's Chris Wood explains the May 9 Global Big Day event, in which birders worldwide are invited to spot birds and upload their findings to the eBird database. Steve Mirsky reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“On May 9th this year will be the first Global Big Day, and the idea is to see, if we have people all around the world on a single day looking for birds, how many birds can we find in 24 hours.”

Chris Wood of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, in Ithaca, New York. He’s the project leader for eBird. It’s an online database by which birdwatchers anywhere on the planet can upload their sightings and help increase the resolution of our information on exactly what birds are hanging out where, and when. I spoke with Wood on a visit to the lab in April. What are called Big Days have been local events for counting birds. But the May 9th Big Day is for the whole world.

CW: “So the hope is that people in India, people in Iran, people in Australia, many of whom are already using eBird, will enter birds that day and see if we can find 3,000 species, 4,000 species. That’s really the idea. It’s one day to go out and explore biodiversity and see this amazing planet that we live on.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


SM: “And is there going to be any kind of working up of that data for a particular reason?”

CW: “Yeah, so what we’ll do is we ask everybody to enter data into eBird. And by having those data in eBird will give insight into populations of birds at some level, but it also just allows us to prioritize and think about, okay, here’s a region of the world where despite these outreach efforts, we haven’t engaged as  many people. And it allows us to help, so we think, okay, for the next year let’s focus here and see if the next year all of a sudden the birds that are on Fiji, maybe, if we have reports of them, and then the idea really is to inspire people to not just count birds on this one day, but really to count birds every week or every day and then really understand about how ecosystems are functioning, how birds are moving across the landscape.”

SM: “So Global Big Day is a way for people to count birds, but for you to count people.”

CW: “Yeah, at some level.”

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe