New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Menopause Symptoms Have Unappreciated Staying Power

Although clinical guidelines assume just two years for hot flashes and night sweats, a large study finds a median symptom duration of more than three times that length. Dina Fine Maron reports 

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


About 80 percent of women going through menopause have to endure night sweats and the dreaded hot flashes. Clinical guidelines have suggested that these discomforts will typically abate after just two years. But several studies have called that timeline into question. And now the largest such investigation to-date finds that these unpleasant features of menopause can endure for as long as 14 years. The study is in JAMA Internal Medicine. [Nancy E. Avis, Duration of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms Over the Menopause Transition]
 
Researchers surveyed almost 1,500 frequent symptom sufferers of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. The median time for the women to experience symptoms was 7.4 years. For African-American women, however, the median stretched out for 10.1 years, while women of Chinese ancestry only had to deal with the symptoms for about half as long. Women whose symptoms start out at the youngest age—including while still menstruating—tend to have to endure them the longest. The study did not address reasons for the racial differences, but did note that factors including smoking and higher perceived stress were associated with significantly longer symptoms.  
 
The new info should enable healthcare providers to offer better guidance for women during this part of their lives. In light of how long some women may be affected, the researchers say that short-term hormone treatment may not be the best approach. They encourage the identification of safe, long-term therapies that women can use for what may be a decade or more.
 
—Dina Fine Maron
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe