New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Rising CO2 Pushes Plants to Drink Sparingly

As carbon dioxide levels rise, plants are sipping water more efficiently—which could come in handy in a drier future. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Getty Images

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Mauna Loa Observatory sits on the side of a Hawaiian volcano, 11,000 feet above the Pacific. And for nearly 60 years, an instrument there has been sniffing the local air—taking a census of carbon dioxide molecules. In that time, CO2 levels have steadily risen, from about 315 parts per million, to 405. And plants enjoy the extra carbon.

"It's kinda obvious plants are going to react to CO2 in the atmosphere, because it changes the environment the leaves are bathed in." Ralph Keeling, a geochemist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. "It's hard for the plants not to benefit from that by having a higher water-use efficiency. But what wasn't clear was how much more efficient they're going to be."

So what’s water-use efficiency? Like us, plants need water for basic life processes. And they open tiny pores in their leaves to allow carbon dioxide in for photosynthesis. But the holes also let the precious water out. Higher water-use efficiency just means losing less water while taking in the CO2.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To figure that just how much the efficiency improves, Keeling and his colleagues examined the ratio of CO2 having the isotope carbon 13 versus its lighter and much more prevalent cousin, carbon 12. "So the ratio is 0.2 percent lower than it was pre-industrially. Doesn't sound like a lot, does it?"

And yet, that small change in carbon 13 versus carbon 12 allowed Keeling and his colleagues to quantify just how much more efficiently plants are sipping water in a higher-CO2 regime. And, it turns out, their water use efficiency rises right in step with CO2 levels.

"If you dial back to how much CO2 has gone up since pre-industrial times, you're talking about a 40 percent increase in CO2 overall, and thus a 40 percent increase in some measure of water-use efficiency. So it's no small change." The study is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Ralph F. Keeling et al., Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis]

As we flood the atmosphere with more CO2, and average global temperatures rise, some areas of the planet are getting wetter. But other spots face a drier future—where this water-sipping innovation might be a lifesaver. Unfortunately, there’s no evidence that in a hotter future, we humans will naturally use water more efficiently.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe