Rising CO2 Pushes Plants to Drink Sparingly

As carbon dioxide levels rise, plants are sipping water more efficiently—which could come in handy in a drier future. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Getty Images

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Mauna Loa Observatory sits on the side of a Hawaiian volcano, 11,000 feet above the Pacific. And for nearly 60 years, an instrument there has been sniffing the local air—taking a census of carbon dioxide molecules. In that time, CO2 levels have steadily risen, from about 315 parts per million, to 405. And plants enjoy the extra carbon.

"It's kinda obvious plants are going to react to CO2 in the atmosphere, because it changes the environment the leaves are bathed in." Ralph Keeling, a geochemist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. "It's hard for the plants not to benefit from that by having a higher water-use efficiency. But what wasn't clear was how much more efficient they're going to be."

So what’s water-use efficiency? Like us, plants need water for basic life processes. And they open tiny pores in their leaves to allow carbon dioxide in for photosynthesis. But the holes also let the precious water out. Higher water-use efficiency just means losing less water while taking in the CO2.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To figure that just how much the efficiency improves, Keeling and his colleagues examined the ratio of CO2 having the isotope carbon 13 versus its lighter and much more prevalent cousin, carbon 12. "So the ratio is 0.2 percent lower than it was pre-industrially. Doesn't sound like a lot, does it?"

And yet, that small change in carbon 13 versus carbon 12 allowed Keeling and his colleagues to quantify just how much more efficiently plants are sipping water in a higher-CO2 regime. And, it turns out, their water use efficiency rises right in step with CO2 levels.

"If you dial back to how much CO2 has gone up since pre-industrial times, you're talking about a 40 percent increase in CO2 overall, and thus a 40 percent increase in some measure of water-use efficiency. So it's no small change." The study is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Ralph F. Keeling et al., Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis]

As we flood the atmosphere with more CO2, and average global temperatures rise, some areas of the planet are getting wetter. But other spots face a drier future—where this water-sipping innovation might be a lifesaver. Unfortunately, there’s no evidence that in a hotter future, we humans will naturally use water more efficiently.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe