New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Subway DNA Survey Finds Microbes, Mozzarella and Mystery

Scientists sequenced genetic material found in all 468 New York City subway stations, and nearly half matched no known organism. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A 2014 analysis found that New York City’s Queens was the most ethnically diverse county in the continental U.S. But when it comes to the diversity of DNA found in each borough's subway stops--the Bronx takes the prize.

"I live in Brooklyn so I was kind of hoping Brooklyn might be top of the list but we're second place. Manhattan in the middle. And then Queens, and then Staten Island." Christopher Mason, a geneticist "a very curious geneticist, I'd say" at the Weill Cornell Medical College in Manhattan.

Mason's curiosity led him and his colleagues on a five-borough tour of New York’s 468 subway stations, and the Staten Island Railway. They swabbed turnstiles, kiosks, benches, trash cans, railings and subway cars, then sequenced every bit of DNA they found. The result? "The subway kind of looks like skin." Meaning they found a whole lot of bacteria, like Pseudomonas, that also live on our skin.

The DNA at each subway stop mirrored the genetic diversity of the local residents—and, what they like to eat. "We could see other evidence of things like molecular echoes of pizza. Cucumbers, as well as chickpeas that might be from falafels or hummus." The researchers also found DNA fragments from anthrax and plague bacteria. But don’t panic. "We have zero evidence that they're alive or remotely pose a risk to public health." 

The team turned up some 1,700 organisms in total. But nearly half the DNA they sequenced could not be linked to any known organism. Assuming there’s no actual Men In Black-type extraterrestrial police agency operating underground in Manhattan, the unknown DNA means that we either haven't discovered some subway dwellers—or maybe we just haven't sequenced their DNA yet. The study is in the journal Cell Systems. [Ebrahim Afshinnekoo et al, Geospatial Resolution of Human and Bacterial Diversity with City-Scale Metagenomics]

Despite the mysterious genetic sequences, Mason says the research has made his commute a little more carefree. "And the study has replaced what used to be sort of a fog of almost fear maybe about what might be on the surface to concrete knowledge that the vast majority of everything under our fingerprints is mostly benign, so, I've become much more confident."

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe