New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Did our modern human ancestors and Neanderthals share a common culture?

Both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens may have shared tools and behavioral practices, new research suggests

The rebuilt skull and a physical reconstruction of the face and head of a 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman known as Shanidar Z.

Justin Tallis/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have long known that ancient Homo sapiens and Neanderthals lived alongside each other for thousands of years—until that is, Neanderthals went extinct some 40,000 years ago. That includes mating—most of the world’s population carries Neanderthal DNA to this day. But beyond these genetic remnants, the exact nature of any interactions between our species and Neanderthals is much more of a mystery.

Now a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA argues that at least some Neanderthals and modern humans may have shared certain cultural practices.

The research centers on fossil evidence discovered inside a cave in what is now Türkiye called Üçağızlı II. Fossils suggest that Neanderthals occupied Üçağızlı II Cave from around 77,000 to 59,000 years ago and that the cave was then occupied by modern humans until around 47,000 years ago. The study authors don’t explicitly say that the two groups overlapped in their occupancy of the cave, but the evidence suggests they shared previously unrecognized behavior patterns.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Neanderthal and H. sapiens fossils were found at “different layers” in the cave, indicating that they were there in different timeframes, but “they are associated with remarkably similar stone tool technologies, hunting strategies and overall ways of life,” says İsmail Baykara, the study’s lead author and a professor at Gaziantep University in Türkiye.

One of the “biggest surprises,” Baykara says, was that both Neanderthals and modern humans appear to have shared a penchant for collecting the shells of Columbella rustica, a kind of mollusk that can be found along the Mediterranean coast, despite “many other shell species being available,” Baykara says. It’s possible that both modern humans and Neanderthals might have used the mollusk shells for decorative purposes, but more research is needed.

shell next to human finger

Columbella rustica shell associated with Neanderthal remains.

Naoki Morimoto

This mollusk-collecting behavior was previously thought to be “exclusive to modern humans,” Baykara says, adding that the finding “forces us to reconsider the nature of cultural boundaries and perhaps even cognitive capacities among different human groups in the Levant.”

Ultimately, the fossils suggest that “even under intense survival pressures, both groups placed high value on potentially symbolic behaviors,” Baykara says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe