New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Elon Musk says SpaceX will prioritize a city on the moon instead of a colony on Mars

SpaceX’s decision to focus on establishing a lunar city ahead of building a Mars colony represents a significant shift in Elon Musk’s space exploration ambitions

SpaceX's Starship launches during a test flight in 2025.

An October 2025 test flight of SpaceX’s Starship.

Gabriel V. Cardenas/AFP via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On Sunday Elon Musk said that SpaceX is prioritizing the establishment of a “self-growing city” on the moon over and above his long stated ambition to settle Mars.

In a post on his social media platform X, Musk wrote that a lunar city could be built within the next decade. “The mission of SpaceX remains the same: extend consciousness and life as we know it to the stars,” Musk wrote.

The pivot signals a shift in focus for SpaceX, which Musk has long claimed will help establish human civilization on Mars using the company’s still in development megarocket Starship. This is far from the first time Musk has changed SpaceX’s time line for a Mars mission—in 2016, for instance, he suggested a landing could be achieved by 2018, and he later pushed a potential touchdown to 2022.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Then Musk tweaked the timing again, indicating in 2025 that the company was aiming to launch five uncrewed Starships to Mars this year and that they would be loaded with robots made by his car company Tesla. Importantly, 2026 was considered optimal because where Earth and Mars would be in their respective orbits would cut the journey time to approximately six months. Such ideal alignments occur like clockwork every two years, setting a natural cadence for new Mars missions.

But development of Starship has proved more troublesome than Musk projected, with the rocket experiencing catastrophic failures across multiple test flights in recent years. Additionally, SpaceX is on the hook for a Starship-based crewed lunar landing as the linchpin of NASA’s Artemis III mission, which is meant to be the first human foray back to the moon since 1972. Starship’s ongoing woes are now a key driver of delays for the launch of Artemis III, which NASA recently announced has slipped to no earlier than 2028.

Other factors that have potentially driven SpaceX’s shift are its merger with Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI and a planned push to launch a million orbital data centers. In a February 2 blog post, Musk wrote that the latter project, combined with Starship, could eventually lead to manufacturing and launching satellites from the lunar surface.

In his X post on Sunday, Musk said that SpaceX would resume working toward Mars in the next five to seven years. But he pointed out that establishing a base on the moon would be more efficient.

“The overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster,” he wrote.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe