New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See last night’s ‘blood moon’ eclipse from around the world

In a near-total lunar eclipse, the moon turned red-orange for viewers in North America, Europe and Africa

A mostly red moon.

The partial lunar eclipse over Saint Louis, Mo., on August 27, 2026.

David Carson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Last night’s near-total lunar eclipse did not disappoint. In the second and final lunar eclipse of the year, our natural satellite transformed into a stunning red-orange “blood moon” as almost all of it fell under Earth’s shadow.

During a lunar eclipse, Earth passes between the sun and moon, partially or totally obstructing sunlight on the latter. In this case, more than 96 percent of the moon was covered by Earth’s dark shadow, or umbra, according to NASA, making it a “deep partial eclipse.”

The reddish tone comes from the way Earth’s atmosphere filters light—reddish hues slip through to the other side, while other colors are refracted away, much like a sunset.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last night’s eclipse began around 9:23 P.M. EDT on Thursday and lasted until about 3:02 A.M. EDT on Friday. The height of the eclipse occurred at 12:13 A.M. EDT, when the moon was 96.3 percent covered in shadow.

We collected some of the best pictures of the event from around the world.

Partial lunar eclipse above a skyline.

The moon during the partial lunar eclipse on August 28, 2026, in Madrid.

Angel Martinez/Getty Images
The moon looms large above a fortress.

The partial lunar eclipse setting over the fortress Rocca Calascio is seen from Calascio, Italy, on August 28, 2026.

Lorenzo Di Cola/NurPhoto/Getty Images
A faint red moon above a mosque.

The partial lunar eclipse alongside the Nuruosmaniye Mosque in Istanbul on August 28, 2026.

Ahmet Okatali/Anadolu/Getty Images
A mostly red moon.

The partial lunar eclipse over Saint Louis, Mo., on August 27, 2026.

David Carson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/Getty Images
The moon at the tip of the Washington Monument.

The partial lunar eclipse over the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., on August 27, 2026.

Austin DeSisto/NurPhoto/Getty Images

Do you want to catch the next eclipse? While 2027 will see three very subtle, or penumbral, lunar eclipses, the next total lunar eclipse won’t occur until December 31, 2028. But two solar eclipses—when the moon will pass between Earth and the sun—will take place in 2027: a “ring of fire” annular eclipse on February 6 and a total solar eclipse on August 2.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe