New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Soil Microbe Could Clean Up Nuclear Waste

A bacteria-produced protein could help snag, detect or filter radioactive particles

Bacteria eating a nuclear symbol.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Fission in nuclear reactors forges radioactive metal by-products so toxic that they must be stored deep underground, at great cost and effort, for millennia. But a protein made by a common microbe could help ease this hazardous burden, researchers report in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Two of nuclear waste’s most problematic ingredients are metals called americium and curium; each has particularly long-lived forms that decay slowly over thousands of years. Because they radiate so much heat, waste packages containing them must be buried far apart. Isolating them properly is critical to avoid radiation harm to people or the environment, according to Pennsylvania State biochemist Joseph Cotruvo, Jr. “It’s a really big problem if these elements are around even in very small quantities,” he says.*

In 2018 Cotruvo and a team of researchers first reported that Methylorubrum extorquens (an innocuous bacterium commonly found in soil and on plants) produces a protein called lanmodulin. The microbe uses this protein to grab naturally occurring metals, typically from a group called the lanthanides, to drive its metabolism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More recently, Cotruvo and his colleagues found in the lab that lanmodulin binds tightly and readily to americium and curium—and prefers them to many of its regular dance partners. Plus, the bond was thousands of times stabler than that of the next-strongest naturally occurring molecular suitor. They are not sure if lanmodulin produced by the ubiquitous M. extorquens naturally captures or disperses americium and curium ions already in the environment, such as those released by nuclear weapons tests and waste leaks—a possible future study focus.

The researchers propose integrating the protein into radiation detectors and filters to extract these long-lived radioactive metals from contained nuclear waste. They could then be sequestered separately, decreasing the volume of material that needs extended monitoring and spacing. Alternatively, Cotruvo suggests, captured americium and curium could be recycled back into nuclear fuel.

It is serendipitous that a bacterium-created molecule might help build tools to scavenge hazardous human-made contaminants, says Gemma Reguera, a microbiologist at Michigan State University who was not involved in the study. “It’s like a toy,” she says. “There are so many possibilities.”

*Editor’s Note (12/9/21): This paragraph was revised after posting to correct the description of americium and curium.

Nikk Ogasa is a California-based science journalist with a fondness for the environment, Earth and space, and a former editorial intern at Scientific American. Follow Ogasa on Twitter @nikkogasa.

More by Nikk Ogasa
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Radioactive Recycling” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 6 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1221-19b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe